Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Clean Energy Park Not Viable Without Nuclear

  1. Feb 21, 2011 #1
    "Clean Energy Park Not Viable Without Nuclear"

    Here's an interesting twist:

    "Banner's plan would include an energy park of 24,000 acres that would welcome all forms of energy, including wind, solar, geo-thermal and bio-mass, and most importantly nuclear. The only type of energy that would not be included is coal-fired electric generation. Banner says without nuclear the project would not be viable."
    (underlining mine)

    No, I'm not banner, and no, I do not know him. I may, however, toodle on down to Pueblo tomorrow evening to attend the meeting, as I think this would be an interesting event!
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you help with the solution or looking for help too?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Clean Energy Park Not Viable Without Nuclear
  1. Parking. (Replies: 20)