1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Code for matlab convolution by FFT

  1. Jul 30, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    You have two functions in Matlab (represented as column vectors). Compute their convolution using the fast fourier transform.


    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution


    I am having trouble finding a book with this topic. I would like to know where the Matlab-code for such an algorithm would be discussed. It does not seem to be treated in my Giordano/Nakanishi computational text, nor is it in a text on pure Matlab programming. I just need someone to tell me a book.
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 30, 2013 #2

    jbunniii

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Ignoring Matlab for a moment, do you know how to compute a convolution using an FFT, theoretically?
     
  4. Jul 30, 2013 #3
    Yeah--I know how to theoretically a convolution.See attached.

    I also know that "non-theoretically", the domain over which you convolve is not infinite, so you need to zero-pad. I also know you have to "shift" the convolution.

    I have written some code already, and little gremlins keep making it not work. Just kidding...but that's what it seems like. I was looking for a text to help me figure out how to do it correctly.
     

    Attached Files:

  5. Jul 30, 2013 #4
    I know how to do it, and I have code that, in theory, should work properly. The code is behaviing in such a bizzare manner that I am almost certain I need to consult books about the "theory" of convolving-by-fft in order to grasp what the bug is.
     
  6. Jul 30, 2013 #5
    Would you be able to explain what you think is bizarre? The result of ifft(fft(f).*fft(g)) should be the same as cconv(f, g, length(f)) (sizes of f and g must be the same). That is, it will be the same as circular convolution, modulo the length of the vectors.

    It will not be the same as conv(f, g), since that would be a vector of length length(f)+length(g)-1.
     
  7. Jul 30, 2013 #6
    I took two boxcar functions, f=bxc(x,-1,1); g=bxc(x,-2,2); (f has a value of 1 from -1 to 1, and g has value of 1 from -2 to 2; they are 0 everywhere else). The analytic form convolution can be computed, integrate(f(x')*g(x-x')), from x integrated over all domain, yields,

    analytic=-(3+xp).*heaviside(-3-xp)+(1+xp).*heaviside(-1-xp)-(-2+xp).*heaviside(2-xp)+xp.*heaviside(-xp);

    You have the vectors x = -1:0.01:1; xp = -2-0.005:0.01:2+0.005; where the vector xp is double the length of vector x, because the padding doubles the length of the convolved function.

    The program produced the following plot [see attached .png], where "result" is circularly shifted,
    plot(xp,circshift(result',200)',xp,circshift(analytic',0)');

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    clear; clc;
    bxc = @ (x,xmin,xmax) heaviside(xmax-x)-heaviside(xmin-x);

    x = -1:0.01:1; xp = -2-0.005:0.01:2+0.005;
    L = length(x) -1;

    % f = sin(pi*x); g = [ zeros(1,L/2) 1 zeros(1,L/2) ];
    f=bxc(x,-1,1)*1.2; g=bxc(x,-2,2)*1.2;
    analytic=-(3+xp).*heaviside(-3-xp)+(1+xp).*heaviside(-1-xp)-(-2+xp).*heaviside(2-xp)+xp.*heaviside(-xp);

    fpad = [ zeros(1,L/2) f zeros(1,1 + L/2) ];
    gpad = [ zeros(1,L/2) g zeros(1,1 + L/2) ];

    fpadfft = fft(fpad);
    gpadfft = fft(gpad);
    prodfft = fpadfft.*gpadfft;
    result = ifft(prodfft)*0.01;
    % result2 = ifft(gpadfft.*gpadfft);

    indexi = 1:(2*L + 2);
    shiftzero = 1 + mod(indexi -1 +L,(2*L + 2));

    plot(xp,circshift(result',200)',xp,circshift(analytic',0)');
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Jul 31, 2013 #7
    I am sorry--I see at least one mistake. My analytic convolution was taken for boxcar functions that run to intervals as wide as -2 to 2, but the convolution I effect numerically is over the interval -1 to 1. On remedying this problem, one convolution-function still appears stretched out with respect to the other.
     
  9. Jul 31, 2013 #8
    Anyway--I don't expect someone to troubleshoot my code. I just need the name of a book in which this is discussed and treated pedagogically.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Code for matlab convolution by FFT
  1. Heavyside convolution (Replies: 5)

Loading...