Coincidence Events: Understanding the Basics

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of coincidence event in the context of the decay of a deuteron into a proton and an alpha particle. The number of coincidence events detected depends on the solid angle covered by the detectors and can be calculated using the total decay rate and the solid angles covered by the detectors. However, this calculation may differ from the actual number of coincidence events detected if the decay products are not moving independently and isotropically.
  • #1
Manojg
47
0
Hello,

I have a question about coincidence event. Let us take the decay of deuteron to proton and alpha particle, (d, pα). p and α goes in opposite direction. So, if we put two detectors in opposite directions, one of them will detect p and another will detect α simultaneously (within a small time window).

If the solid angle covered by both detectors are same (say Ω) and if one of the detector detect p then it is sure that another one will detect α. If N0 be the total decay rate then number of coincidence event detected will be N0Ω.

However, if the solid angle covered by the detectors are different, say Ω1 and Ω2 such that Ω1 > Ω2 then the number of coincidence event will be equal to the number of events detected by the second detector because other extra event detected by the larger detector won't be detected by the smaller detector.

Are these reasoning right? Because in a book, I saw the number of coincidence event is N0Ω1Ω2.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A deuteron is a stable nucleus with a single proton and a neutron. It cannot decay in the way you describe.
Lithium-5 quickly decays to proton+alpha particle - you have to produce it directly before the decay, and this usually will not happen without any momentum transfer.

If your decay is back to back:
If N0 be the total decay rate then number of coincidence event detected will be N0Ω.
Or 2 times this value, if both detectors are sensitive to both particles. And I guess you should divide it by the full solid angle of a sphere, or express Ω as ratio to that.

then the number of coincidence event will be equal to the number of events detected by the second detector because other extra event detected by the larger detector won't be detected by the smaller detector.
This is an upper limit.

Manojg said:
Are these reasoning right? Because in a book, I saw the number of coincidence event is N0Ω1Ω2.
That would correspond to independently moving, isotropic decay products.
 

1. What exactly is a coincidence event?

A coincidence event is the occurrence of two or more events that seem to be related but are not caused by each other. These events can happen simultaneously or in close succession, giving the appearance of being connected or having some meaning.

2. Are coincidence events just random occurrences?

It is often believed that coincidence events are simply random coincidences with no underlying explanation. However, some scientists argue that there may be underlying patterns or connections that we are not yet able to understand or explain.

3. Can coincidence events be explained by probability or statistics?

Yes, probability and statistics can be used to explain some coincidence events. By looking at the likelihood of two events happening together, we can determine if the occurrence is truly a coincidence or if there is a higher chance of it happening.

4. Are there different types of coincidence events?

Yes, there are different types of coincidence events such as synchronicity, serendipity, and the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon. These terms describe different kinds of coincidences, from meaningful coincidences to chance occurrences that seem to happen more often than expected.

5. Can we predict or control coincidence events?

At this time, we do not have the ability to predict or control coincidence events. While some may argue that certain practices, such as manifestation or the law of attraction, can influence coincidences, there is currently no scientific evidence to support these claims.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
933
  • Classical Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
79
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
725
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
69
Views
12K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
7K
Back
Top