Calculating the Center of Mass of a Uniform Thin Hoop Using Symmetry

  • Thread starter String theory guy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Uniform
In summary, the conversation discusses how to solve a problem involving finding the center of mass without using polar coordinates. Three different approaches are mentioned, including a symmetric pairing argument, using bilateral symmetry, and making use of rotational symmetry. The conversation then continues to explain how to find the x-position of the center of mass using an integral and how this integral can be simplified by observing the symmetry of the problem. Ultimately, it is concluded that the center of mass must be at the center due to rotational symmetry.
  • #1
String theory guy
26
4
Homework Statement
Is there a way of solving this problem without without using polar coordinate's.
Relevant Equations
CM formula
1671083335722.png

1671083353784.png

1671083368331.png
in
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
An easy way is to pair up diametrically opposite identical segments and observe that the mass centre of each pair is at the origin.
 
  • Love
Likes String theory guy
  • #3
By rotational symmetry, the CM must be at the centre.
 
  • Love
Likes jbriggs444 and String theory guy
  • #4
Sorry I was not clear. I would like to understand how to solve this problem without using polar coordinate's.
 
  • #5
Start with the definition of the x-position of the CM relative to the center, $$X_{\text{cm}}=\frac{1}{M}\int x~dm=\frac{1}{M}\int x~\lambda ds$$ where ##ds## is an arc element ##ds=\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2}.##
Now $$x^2+y^2=R^2\implies xdx+ydy=0\implies dy=-\frac{xdx}{y}.$$Therefore $$ds=\sqrt{dx^2+\frac{x^2 dx^2}{y^2}}=dx\sqrt{\frac{x^2+y^2}{y^2}}=R\frac{dx}{|y|}.$$Thus if we integrate over a semicircle from the 3 o'clock position to the 9 o'clock position, $$X_{\text{cm}}=\frac{\lambda R}{M}\int_{R}^{-R}\frac{x dx}{|y|}=\frac{\lambda R}{M}\int_{R}^{-R}\frac{x dx}{\sqrt{R^2-x^2}}.$$At this point you can
  1. Observe that you have an odd function integrated over symmetric limits which means that it vanishes. This is the symmetry argument that people have mentioned.
  2. Actually do the integral and verify that it vanishes. Let ##u^2=R^2-x^2##, etc. etc.
Obviously, the integral that completes the circle from the 9 o'clock position to the 3 o'clock position also vanishes and so do the integrals for ##Y_{\text{cm}}##.

Is this what you were looking for?
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Love
Likes String theory guy, PeroK, Lnewqban and 1 other person
  • #6
String theory guy said:
Sorry I was not clear. I would like to understand how to solve this problem without using polar coordinate's.
None of the replies mention polar coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes String theory guy and PeroK
  • #7
kuruman said:
This is the symmetry argument that people have mentioned.
Well, it is at least a symmetry argument that people have mentioned. I see three approaches via symmetry. There may be more.

@haruspex uses a symmetric pairing argument show that the COM is the average of a bunch of zero vectors.

One can do as you suggest and use bilateral symmetry in one dimension to get the x coordinate of the COM and then in the orthogonal dimension to get the y coordinate of the COM, both of which must be zero.

Or one can do as @PeroK seems to suggest and simply observe that by rotational symmetry, there is no preferred direction. So the COM, if any, can only be at the center. That one fits my personal sense of mathematical aesthetics best.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes PeroK, hutchphd and String theory guy
  • #8
kuruman said:
Start with the definition of the x-position of the CM relative to the center, $$X_{\text{cm}}=\frac{1}{M}\int x~dm=\frac{1}{M}\int x~\lambda ds$$ where ##ds## is an arc element ##ds=\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2}.##
Now $$x^2+y^2=R^2\implies xdx+ydy=0\implies dy=-\frac{xdx}{y}.$$Therefore $$ds=\sqrt{dx^2+\frac{x^2 dx^2}{y^2}}=dx\sqrt{\frac{x^2+y^2}{y^2}}=R\frac{dx}{|y|}.$$Thus if we integrate over a semicircle from the 3 o'clock position to the 9 o'clock position, $$X_{\text{cm}}=\frac{\lambda R}{M}\int_{R}^{-R}\frac{x dx}{|y|}=\frac{\lambda R}{M}\int_{R}^{-R}\frac{x dx}{\sqrt{R^2-x^2}}.$$At this point you can
  1. Observe that you have an odd function integrated over symmetric limits which means that it vanishes. This is the symmetry argument that people have mentioned.
  2. Actually do the integral and verify that it vanishes. Let ##u^2=R^2-x^2##, etc. etc.
Obviously, the integral that completes the circle from the 9 o'clock position to the 3 o'clock position also vanishes and so do the integrals for ##Y_{\text{cm}}##.

Is this what you were looking for?
Yep, Thank You.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

1. What is the meaning of "CoM" in the context of a uniform thin hoop?

CoM stands for "Center of Mass", which is the point at which an object's mass is evenly distributed in all directions. In the case of a uniform thin hoop, the CoM is the point at the center of the hoop where the mass is evenly distributed around the axis of rotation.

2. How is the CoM of a uniform thin hoop calculated?

The CoM of a uniform thin hoop can be calculated by finding the average of the radii of the hoop. This is known as the "radius of gyration". The CoM is located at a distance of half the radius of gyration from the axis of rotation.

3. Does the CoM of a uniform thin hoop change when the hoop is rotated?

No, the CoM of a uniform thin hoop does not change when the hoop is rotated. This is because the mass is evenly distributed around the axis of rotation, so the CoM remains at the same point.

4. How does the CoM of a uniform thin hoop affect its stability?

The CoM of a uniform thin hoop is an important factor in determining its stability. If the CoM is located above the point of contact with the ground, the hoop will be stable and will not tip over. However, if the CoM is located outside the point of contact, the hoop will be unstable and will tip over.

5. Can the CoM of a uniform thin hoop be outside the physical boundaries of the hoop?

Yes, the CoM of a uniform thin hoop can be outside the physical boundaries of the hoop. This is because the CoM is a theoretical point that represents the distribution of mass in an object, and does not necessarily have to be located within the physical boundaries of the object.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
624
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
259
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
703
Back
Top