Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Comments on the DNC?

  1. Jul 26, 2004 #1

    loseyourname

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member

    Who else watched it? What did you think? Did you see the almost constant look of discomfort on Joe Scarborough's face?

    Did anybody else think Clinton, as good of a speaker as he is, just can't help but come across as a sleazy used-car salesman?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 27, 2004 #2

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    My roommate, a democrat and real Bush hater is annoyed by the fact that the Democrats keep him around and downright pissed that they keep feeding Hillary. Both are divisive, though I'm not sure which is worse. It almost seems like pathetic nostalgia. Those were the days...

    I listened to a little of both speeches. Not a whole lot in them except some funny self-deprecation from Billy. Nice to see he can make fun of himself, anyway. The content, though, was for the most part predictable drivel. One nice thing was it was not too much anti-Bush, but rather pro-Kerry. Seems the party is finally learning that being negative isn't a good thing (see the thread on the subject...).
     
  4. Jul 27, 2004 #3

    loseyourname

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member

    Did you see Jimmy Carter's speech? He was fuming.

    Hilary isn't just divisive, but she's terribly uninteresting to watch. Everything just seems so calculated with her, so not-genuine. She's like Angela Lansbury in The Manchurian Candidate, but without the charisma.
     
  5. Jul 27, 2004 #4

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Having once dated a former president of the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society). I tend to shy away from political discussion. :bugeye:

    I was only able to catch the very beginning. The woman who spoke after Glenn Close was very good. Unfortunately, I missed the rest.
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2004
  6. Jul 27, 2004 #5

    loseyourname

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member

    Oh God, that's sick. Please tell me you were very young when you did this.
     
  7. Jul 27, 2004 #6

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Before you were born, most likely. In the 70's. I was very young.
     
  8. Jul 27, 2004 #7

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    No, but I don't much care for him either. There used to be an understanding that former Presidents wouldn't attack sitting Presidents. Even Clinton seems to be following it. Carter used attacks on sitting presidents to get himself a Nobel Peace(the "P" could just as well stand for "Politics") Prize.
    I need to see that movie.
     
  9. Jul 27, 2004 #8

    loseyourname

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member

    If you decide to see the remake, see the original first. Some of the best acting you'll ever see.
     
  10. Jul 27, 2004 #9

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    How much do you think the general public is persuaded by the televised conventions?

    I tend not to get into political arguments, but I think that this election is likely to bring out the largest number of voters in recent memory.

    The last Presidential election was a sorry testament to the level of apathy people had in who governed them. People tended to feel it was just a lesser of two evils.

    Since I have sworn off politics for health reasons, that's all I am going to say.

    Hopefully I can get to see reruns of the DNC opening that I missed.
     
  11. Jul 27, 2004 #10
    You hit that nail on the head, she's manipulative as hell and has the personality of a prison warden.
     
  12. Jul 27, 2004 #11

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    An awful lot - for about 3 weeks after each convention. Then they forget.

    Bush and Kerry are currently in a dead heat - by the end of the week it'll be 60-40 Kerry.
     
  13. Jul 27, 2004 #12

    Njorl

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I find the convention weeks to be the least interesting of the campaign season. They're both completely stage managed. Nothing interesting ever seems to happen at them, and because they suck in all the media, anything else interesting goes unreported. I usually watch the acceptance speech, and that's about it.

    The nominating speech is also worth watching sometimes. While the topic is banal (they talk about the guy who will be inundated with press coverage for the next 15 weeks) they usually get good speakers. Often it is a clue who the party wants to groom for a run at the white house eventually. This will be more interesting in teh Republican convention. Who will the Republican powerbrokers begin grooming to oppose McCain in 2008?

    Njorl
     
  14. Jul 27, 2004 #13

    kat

    User Avatar

    I only saw Glenn Close through Bill Clinton and a bit of Gore. Hilary was very unconvincing, she seemed to me as though she was forcing herself to go through the motions when talking about Kerry. Bill, as always, was an engaging speaker but I think that only helps to show how un-engaging Kerry is. It's a good thing that Kerry isn't following Billy boy. Gore...really should be shelved, I don't think he does anything for the party except maybe keep the pissed off Gore-ites pissed off. He just seems bloated and pathetic to me.
     
  15. Jul 27, 2004 #14

    Njorl

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I think you are underestimating the value of this enormously. Gore received many more votes than Clinton ever did.

    Njorl
     
  16. Jul 27, 2004 #15

    BobG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I thought Gore looked much more personal and relaxed than during his campaign 4 years ago (I think the transformation was just as dramatic as Bob Dole's appearances after his hopes for future political aspirations were gone). Made we wonder why I only saw a light weight loser who rode to success on his daddy's coat tails (or was that Bush?). Aww, who am I kidding - he's still a light weight loser even if he at least looks better.

    Bill Clinton was as good as ever. He's a sleazeball and knowing he's a sleazeball might bias one's opinion of his performance, but he's still got that on-stage charisma of a talk show host.

    Carter wasn't that impressive. But, then again, past history may have a little to do with that. I used to think of him as a decent person, but an ineffective leader. His meddlings since then have lowered my opinion of him a little bit more and it's hard to take him very seriously.

    Hillary is just not that interesting.
     
  17. Jul 27, 2004 #16

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    There are supposed to be real events happening, like discussing and laying out a platform. But everything is already polished and packaged.
    A very good question.
     
  18. Jul 29, 2004 #17

    amp

    User Avatar

    Actually, the convention is interesting. Bill Clinton attacked Bush politely "...in the only test that matters, are you better off now than before.." and when he spoke of the surplus Bush squandered. Polite attacks that made a good point. Barack Obama may become the first afro-american prez, if he is as good as the key-note address he gave which was about unity "...there are no liberal amreica ... no conservative america ... we are the United States of America..." He reached out to encompass the country and I think America will respond. Sharpton rebuked Bush for his presumtiveness, that was good. John Edwards speech was good also "Hope is on the way" and when he pointed out the the Republicans don't seem have or can't put anything on the table so they try to divide and sling mud. They haven't said anything positive but go on and on with negative ads against Kerry.

    The question that will be answered come November is do we want a United States of America that benefits all US citizens or a Divided States of America that benefits a select few.
     
  19. Jul 29, 2004 #18

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That's how Clinton won his first election, but its not as simple this time. The answer in 1992 was a clear-cut no for a large percentage of Americans. Today, it isn't.
    My dad told me about his speach and I'm a little upset I missed it. Sounds like a great guy - unfortunately, that is not the message of the Democratic party and they will work to prevent his rise just as the Republican Party cut McCain off at the knees.

    The Democrat's will say 'one America,' right before they say 'stick it to the rich.' People who don't see a conflict have no reason to vote to fix it, therefore the Democrats must work hard to promote the idea that there isn't 'one America.'
     
    Last edited: Jul 29, 2004
  20. Jul 29, 2004 #19
    I'm sure we'll see a LOT more bashing coming from the Republican convention than we did from the Democratic one. I think the convention has been pretty tame so far. Good to see that Democrats have some restraint.

    I don't know why Bush, as an incumbent, has had as many negative ads as he did. Interestingly, I’ve heard many Bush supports say Kerry isn’t making a case as to why people should vote for him, but rather why people shouldn't vote for Bush. However, according to ‘the Campaign Media Analysis Group,’ 75% of Bush’s television ads have been negative while only 27% of Kerry’s have been. *

    Kinda makes you wonder…

    *Source: http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040613/news_1n13pres.html
     
  21. Jul 29, 2004 #20

    amp

    User Avatar

    Russ -
    What country are you in? In the USA, unemployment is up - the jobs that have been created are substantially inferior to the ones that were lost. We are less safe than we were before we pre-empted Iraq. Terrorist recruitment is going up. Health care cost are spiraling out of control. Civil liberties have been dissed. Do I need to go on. No, we are not better off than before Bush.

    No, again thats not going to happen. Obama will likely get all the support he needs.

    Unity is the message, purpose and drive of the Democratic party, NOW. This current Admin has forced the party to re-invent itself and embrace its core values and beliefs more firmly, to realize we are all in the same boat, to reason that if it sinks - we all drown. Do children spontaneously share with their siblings or even other children? Yes, they do unless they learn selfishness from an adult.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Comments on the DNC?
  1. DNC false fromt (Replies: 5)

  2. DNC bans lobbyist money (Replies: 18)

Loading...