Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Commutation and eigenstates

  1. Mar 3, 2012 #1
    We now that if [A,B]=0, they have the same eigenstates. But consider a harmonic oscillator with the spring constant k1. If we change k1 to k2, then [H1,H2]=0 and the above expression implies that the eigenstates should not change while they really change!
    Could you please tell me if i am wrong?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 3, 2012 #2
    I don't think [H1,H2] is 0, [H1,H2]=[p^2+k_1*x^2, p^2+k_2*x^2]=k_1[x^2,p^2]+k_2[p^2,x^2]=(k_1-k_2)[x^2,p^2], neither of the two factors is 0.
     
  4. Mar 4, 2012 #3

    tom.stoer

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    1) kof9595995 is right, the two Hamiltonian do not commute b/c H2 = H1 + (k2-k1)x2 and therefore [H1,H2] = [H1,H1 + (k2-k1)x2] = [H1,H1 + (k2-k1)x2] = (k2-k1)/2m [p2,x2]

    2) the eigenvectors for two commuting observables are relevant for two observables in one system; but two Hamiltonians describe two different systems, so this is an academic question
     
  5. Mar 4, 2012 #4
    1) agree

    2) In the sudden approximation you apply a new Hamiltonian to an "old" set of wave functions to find the transition probabilities due to the change. If the "new" Eigenvectors are the same as the old ones, you know exactly where you end up.
     
  6. Mar 4, 2012 #5

    tom.stoer

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    regarding 2) there may indeed be some applications where this makes sense; but in general you are intersted in a system described by a unique H and by a set of observables {H, O1, O2, ...}.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Commutation and eigenstates
  1. Proving an eigenstate (Replies: 6)

  2. Common eigenstates (Replies: 7)

  3. Position eigenstates (Replies: 89)

Loading...