Commutativity of the Born Rule

  • Thread starter the_pulp
  • Start date
195
7
is the probability that a system in state y before the measurement will be in state x after the measurement, at least if we're talking about a measurement that doesn't destroy the system.
Yes, thats how I see it.

This is correct. However, vanhees71 wasn't talking about the dual of the Hilbert space. He was talking about the dual of one of its vector subspaces. If K⊂H, then H∗⊂K∗. The dual of the subspace is larger than the dual of the Hilbert space. It's a topological vector space, but not a Hilbert space. Members of that space may not have a norm for example. This trick allows us to assign a meaning to "eigenstates" of operators like position and momentum. They can be defined as members of K∗−H∗.

(Not sure if this has anything to do with the topic of this thread. I'm just making an observation about the mathematics).
Yes Ive just reading Ballentine again, but as you said, its true but not related to the original question, to me.
 

Related Threads for: Commutativity of the Born Rule

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
248
  • Last Post
4
Replies
95
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Top