I'm looking at prop 19.5 of Taylor's PDE book.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The theorem is:

If M is a compact, connected, oriented manifold of dimension n, and a is an n-form, then a=dB where B is an n-1 form iff the ∫a over M is 0.

I'm trying to understand why a=dB implies ∫a = 0.

If M has no boundary, than this follows from Stokes theorem.

However, if M has a boundary, then it seems like this is a counterexample:

a = dx^dy, B=xdy, M=unit square in R^2

Here, ∫a = 1, and a=dB.

The general definitions of compact manifold I've found don't assume no boundary.

What am I missing?

thanks

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Compact manifold question

Loading...

Similar Threads for Compact manifold question |
---|

A Smooth extension on manifolds |

I Manifold with a boundary |

I Parallelizable Manifold |

I Lorentz group is non-compact |

A Compact Lie group |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**