Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Completion of Metric Space Proof from Intro. to Func. Analysis w/ Applications

  1. Jul 1, 2012 #1
    Completion of Metric Space Proof from "Intro. to Func. Analysis w/ Applications"

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    I have started studying Functional Analysis following "Introduction to Functional Analysis with Applications". In chapter 1-6 there is the following proof

    For any metric space [itex]X[/itex], there is a complete metric space [itex]\hat{X}[/itex] which has a subspace [itex]W[/itex] that is isometric with [itex]X[/itex] and is dense in [itex]\hat{X}[/itex]

    (Page 1 & 2) http://i.imgur.com/CRXjh.png
    (Page 3 & 4) http://i.imgur.com/PogqC.png

    I think I understand parts (a) and (b). At the top of page 3, section (c) where it is proving [itex]\hat{X}[/itex] is complete it states:

    Let [itex](\hat{x_{n}})[/itex] be any Cauchy Sequence in [itex]\hat{X}[/itex]. Since [itex]W[/itex] is dense in [itex]\hat{X}[/itex], for every [itex]\hat{x_{n}}[/itex], there is a [itex]\hat{z_{n}}\varepsilon W[/itex] such that [itex]\hat{d}(\hat{x_{n}},\hat{z_{n}}) < \frac{1}{n}[/itex]

    I do not understand why we choose [itex] \frac{1}{n}[/itex], would some ε > 0, for each n, not suffice? I assume it must not, but I don't see why, so I must not understand this proof.

    Any help would be greatly appreciated, i am pretty dumb and this has puzzled me for a couple days.
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Discussions: Completion of Metric Space Proof from Intro. to Func. Analysis w/ Applications
Loading...