I am curious about the complex nature of the amplitudes used in Schrodinger's equation, and what (if anything) it means physically.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I ran across this topic being discussed sometime in the past on this forum, and several posters alluded to some deep significance to this fact, but didn't provide anything specific.

I'm not seeing it so far. It appears to me that the complex valued amplitudes are just a mathematical shortcut and don't appear to have any physical meaning beyond that. It appears to basically reduce the usual second order wave equation with two fields to a 1st order wave equation with one field. You still have all the same degrees of freedom, they're just pasted together in the same variable, taking advantage of linearity. (A diffeq version of the EE trick for handling sin-wave signals).

The dot product of the complex field is the same as the sum of the dot products of the two independent real fields of the second order equation. Nothing new there.

I suppose the real significance would be if you were dealing with a nonlinear equation. In my reading so far, it is claimed that the laws of QM are linear in all cases measured so far. If we were to ever encounter a situation with nonlinear behavior, I would anticipate the nonlinearity to look different operating on a complex variable, versus two real ones. (Either that, or you would just come up with different looking operators for each case to reproduce the same behavior in the model.)

So what's the significance? Where does mathematical convenience end and a concrete statement about the operations of physical law begin? (Or is it all mathematical convenience, using higher DOF mathematical objects at all in the first place?)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Complex Amplitude

Loading...

Similar Threads - Complex Amplitude | Date |
---|---|

I Complex numbers of QM | Feb 14, 2018 |

Does a photon's complex 'amplitude' rotate along its journey? | Oct 7, 2011 |

Probability is square of amplitude or it's product with complex conjugate? | Jan 21, 2010 |

Why need *complex* probability amplitude? | Oct 15, 2008 |

Complex amplitude,Feynman diagrams | Dec 8, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**