Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Complex fourier series issue.

  1. Oct 24, 2012 #1
    Hello,

    First post. I will attempt to use latex, something that involves me jabbing my keyboard with a pen since my \ key is missing.

    We have an assignment question which I have solved, but there is a deeper issue I don't understand.

    We are asked to find the complex fourier series representation of

    [tex] f(x) = x^2, \ -\pi < x < \pi, \ f(x+2\pi) = f(x) [/tex]

    Initially I did the working, used integration by parts twice, and got the result

    [tex] f(x) \sim \sum \sinh (in\pi)(\frac{\pi^2 n^2 + 2\pi in+2}{\pi i n^3})e^{-inx}) [/tex]
    summed for n between negative infinity to infinity.

    This is obviously incorrect because [itex] \sinh (in\pi) = 0 [/itex].

    I received a tip off about how to go about solving the question, and early in the working I split the complex exponential term into its cos and isin terms.
    Because the region of integration is symmetric and [itex] x^2 \times i\sin(nx) [/itex]
    is odd, this term becomes 0 and the complex coefficients become real, the working proceeds and I get the correct answer which is
    [tex]f(x) \sim \frac{\pi^2}{3} + 2\sum \frac{(-1)^n}{n^2} e^{-inx} [/tex]

    where the sum is over all infinity again, except n = 0 which was worked out seperately.

    I've omitted the working because it took so long just to do that, but if I need to I can show it.

    I'm pretty sure the working in both cases is right.
    What I don't understand is how they come to different answers, excluding for n = 0, which we work out separately, and is the same in either case.
    The first way comes up with a sum of 0s, unless I've done something wrong.

    I could understand if the first method returned an undefined answer.
    Then it is just undefined and we have to try something else to get a defined answer.
    But in both cases (excluding n = 0 obviously), the sums are well defined as far as I can tell.

    Why are they different? Have I just done something wrong in the working or is there something I don't understand happening?

    Adam.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 24, 2012 #2

    chiro

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Hey TehAdzMan.

    Can you show us the working for the first problem?
     
  4. Oct 25, 2012 #3
    Thanks for replying.

    Ok so here is the working for the first, incorrect part.

    [tex] f(x) \sim \sum^{\infty}_{n = -\infty} C_n e^{-inx}, \ where \ C_n = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} x^2 e^{inx} dx \\ [/tex]

    Proceeding to calculate Cn using integration by parts

    [tex]

    C_n = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \{ \left[ \frac {x^2 e^{inx}}{in} \right]^{\pi}_{-\pi} - \int^{\pi}_{-\pi} \frac {2xe^{inx}}{in} dx \} \\

    [/tex]

    and a second application of integration by parts

    [tex]

    = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \{ \frac{\pi^2 e^{in \pi} - \pi^2 e^{-in \pi}}{in} - \frac{2}{in} \left[ \left[ \frac {xe^{inx}}{in} \right]^{\pi}_{-\pi} - \int^{\pi}_{ -\pi} \frac{e^{inx}}{in} dx \right] \} \\

    = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \{ \frac{\pi^2}{in} (e^{in \pi} - e^{-in \pi}) - \frac{2}{in} \left[ \frac{\pi e^{in \pi}}{in} + \frac{\pi e^{-in \pi}}{in} - \left[ \frac {e^{inx}}{i^2 n^2} \right]^{\pi}_{-\pi} \right] \} \\

    = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \{ \frac{2 \pi^2}{in} \sinh (in \pi) - \frac{4 \pi}{i^2 n^2} \sinh (in \pi) - \frac{2}{i^3 n^3} (e^{in \pi} - e^{-in \pi}) \} [/tex]

    which, with some arrangement gives

    [tex] C_n = \sinh (in\pi)(\frac{\pi^2 n^2 + 2\pi in+2}{\pi i n^3}) [/tex]

    So basically sinh(in pi) is coming out at every step, which = 0.

    The correct calculation just involves splitting the complex exponential up into cos and i sin, getting rid of the i sin for the aforementioned reason, and proceeding in a very similar fashion, using integration by parts twice.

    Is something wrong in that working?
     
  5. Oct 25, 2012 #4
    Ok there was a working error. My bad.
    It turns out it is the same.

    I learnt latex tho so thats good.
    I'm trying to work out how to delete this or mark it as DONT READ or something now.
     
  6. Oct 25, 2012 #5
    Why can I only edit my last post? Can I change the thread name etc?
    Can I delete the post to rid this forum of a useless post?
    I looked for this info but couldn't find it.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Complex fourier series issue.
Loading...