1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Complex Numbers

  1. Aug 29, 2011 #1
    I am reading a chapter on Complex Functions, Laplace Transforms & Cauchy Riemann (as part of Control theory)

    And I don't understand how they arrive at a particular part.
    [ I tried to type it out in tex, but it takes way too much time so uploaded a screenshot to flickr]

    [PLAIN]http://www.flickr.com/photos/66943862@N06/6093176535/ [Broken]

    Here is a http://www.flickr.com/photos/66943862@N06/6093176535/" [Broken]

    I understand how you get to Eqn1 & Eqn2.
    But how does it add up to Equation3?

    Can someone explain?

    Also, I don't understand why it's not analytic at s = -1?
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 29, 2011 #2
    Hi phiby! :smile:

    \frac{\partial G_x}{\partial \sigma}+j\frac{\partial G_y}{\partial \sigma}
    & = & \frac{\omega^2-(\sigma+1)^2+2j\omega(\sigma+1)}{[(\sigma+1)^2+\omega^2]^2}\\
    & = & \frac{\omega^2+2j\omega(\sigma+1)+j^2(\sigma+1)^2}{[\omega^2-j^2(\sigma+1)^2]^2}\\
    & = & \frac{[\omega+j(\sigma+1)]^2}{[(\omega-j(\sigma+1))(\omega+j(\sigma+1))]^2}\\
    & = & \frac{1}{(\omega-j(\sigma+1))^2}\\
    & = & \frac{1}{(-j)^2(\sigma+1+j\omega)^2}\\
    & = & -\frac{1}{\sigma+j\omega+1}

    The function G is not analytic in -1 since it doesn't exist there. Indeed, G(-1) is undefined and is a pole. (so it's not even a removable singularity)
  4. Aug 29, 2011 #3

    Awesome. Thanks a lot. I got what you did (the simplification of the equation), but didn't get how you knew you had to do that to simplify the original stuff.

    I studied a lot of engineering math 20 years ago & I am getting back to it after 20 years (almost did none of this in the 20 years). So it's taking me a little time to get this.

    In the original page (my flickr link), I first didn't get how it was separated into Gx & Gy, so I went back & did a review of partial fractions & then it became simple.

    So my question is - what part of math should I review to do what you did above?
  5. Aug 29, 2011 #4
    Well, the things I used where the equations




    If you know these very well, then you can find the above solution.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook