- #1

- 128

- 0

[itex]a = C * \exp(i \phi) [/itex]

where C is some non-complex scalar constant. Then the phase of this complex number is simply [itex]\phi[/itex]. Is that correct?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter pamparana
- Start date

- #1

- 128

- 0

[itex]a = C * \exp(i \phi) [/itex]

where C is some non-complex scalar constant. Then the phase of this complex number is simply [itex]\phi[/itex]. Is that correct?

- #2

- 3,473

- 255

If ##C > 0## then this is almost correct. However, the phase is not well-defined under this definition, because ##C\exp(i\phi) = C\exp(i(\phi+2\pi n))## for any integer ##n##. You can get around this by defining the phase to be the coset ##\phi + 2\pi \mathbb{Z}## or by constraining it to be in the interval ##[0,2\pi)## or ##[-\pi, \pi)## or some other half-open interval of length ##2\pi##.

[itex]a = C * \exp(i \phi) [/itex]

where C is some non-complex scalar constant. Then the phase of this complex number is simply [itex]\phi[/itex]. Is that correct?

If ##C < 0##, then you need to absorb the sign of ##C## into the phase:

$$a = -|C|\exp(i \phi) = |C|\exp(i(\phi + \pi))$$

If ##C = 0## then the phase is undefined.

- #3

- 128

- 0

Thank you for this detailed answer!

Share: