Proving f(x)>0 for All xElement-ofsymbol [a,b]

  • Thread starter Swamifez
  • Start date
In summary, if f(x)>0 for all xElement-ofsymbol [a,b], then the integral from a to b of f(x) is also greater than 0. This is true even if f(x)>0 for only some xElement-ofsymbol [a,b], and also holds if f is continuous at some point x0 in [a,b] and f(x0)>0.
  • #1
Swamifez
9
0
If f(x)>0 for all xElement-ofsymbol [a,b], then
b
Integral sign f>0
a

a) Give an example where f(x)>0 for all xElement-ofsymbol [a,b], and f(x)>0 for some xElement-ofsymbol [a,b], and

b
Integral sign f=0
a

b) Suppose that f(x)>0 for all xElement-of symbol[a,b] and f is continuous on at x0 in [a,b] and f(x0)>0. Prove that

b
Integral sign f>0
a
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"elements of" is written in words as "in" (ex: for all x in A,...)

As worded, these questions are both equivalent to

"Show that if f f(x)>0 for all xElement-ofsymbol [a,b], then
[tex]\int_a^bfdx>0[/tex]"

But this is precisely the statement of the result you cited in the begining, so the questions are not challenging at all and contain unnecessary words.
 
  • #3


a) An example where f(x)>0 for all xElement-ofsymbol [a,b] could be the function f(x) = x^2 + 1 on the interval [0,1]. This function is always positive on the interval and satisfies the condition.

An example where f(x)>0 for some xElement-ofsymbol [a,b] could be the function f(x) = sin(x) on the interval [0,π]. This function is positive for some values of x, but also takes on negative values.

b
Integral sign f=0
a

b) If f(x)>0 for all xElement-of symbol[a,b], then this means that the area under the curve is always positive. Since f is continuous on [a,b] and f(x0)>0, we can use the Intermediate Value Theorem to show that there exists a neighborhood of x0 where f(x)>0. This means that the area under the curve on this neighborhood will also be positive. Since the function is continuous, this neighborhood can be extended to cover the entire interval [a,b], thus proving that the integral of f(x) over [a,b] is positive.
 

What is the significance of proving f(x)>0 for all x in the interval [a,b]?

Proving that f(x) is greater than 0 for all x in the interval [a,b] is important because it demonstrates that the function is always positive within that range. This can provide valuable information about the behavior of the function and help in the analysis and prediction of its values.

What does it mean if f(x) is not greater than 0 for all x in the interval [a,b]?

If f(x) is not greater than 0 for all x in the interval [a,b], it means that there are some values of x within that range where the function is equal to or less than 0. This could indicate a potential issue with the function, such as a discontinuity or a root, and requires further investigation and analysis.

How can I prove that f(x) is greater than 0 for all x in the interval [a,b]?

There are several methods for proving that f(x) is greater than 0 for all x in the interval [a,b]. One approach is to use mathematical induction, where we first show that f(a) is greater than 0 and then show that if f(x) is greater than 0 for any arbitrary value x, then f(x+1) is also greater than 0. Another method is to use the intermediate value theorem, which states that if a continuous function takes on two values, then it must also take on all values in between. By showing that f(x) takes on a positive value at the start of the interval and a positive value at the end, we can conclude that it must also take on positive values throughout the interval.

What are the implications of proving f(x)>0 for all x in the interval [a,b]?

Proving that f(x)>0 for all x in the interval [a,b] can have various implications depending on the context. For example, in calculus, it could mean that the function is always increasing within that range. In statistics, it could indicate that the function represents a probability distribution. In general, it provides valuable information about the behavior of the function and can help in making predictions and drawing conclusions.

What if I cannot prove that f(x)>0 for all x in the interval [a,b]?

If it is not possible to prove that f(x)>0 for all x in the interval [a,b], it could mean that the function is not always positive within that range. This could be due to various factors such as discontinuities, roots, or other mathematical complexities. In this case, further analysis and investigation may be necessary to better understand the behavior of the function.

Similar threads

  • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
384
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
934
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top