I am working with a complex scalar field written in terms of two independent real scalar fields and trying to derive the commutator relations.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So,

[tex] \phi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(\phi_1 + i \phi_2) [/tex]

where [itex]\phi_1[/itex] and [itex]\phi_2[/itex] are real.

When deriving,

[tex] [\phi(\vec{x},t),\dot{\phi}(\vec{x}',t)] = 0 [/tex]

I get terms like the following:

[tex][\phi_1(\vec{x},t),\dot{\phi}_2(\vec{x}',t)][/tex]

which I need to vanish. It makes sense to me that they should vanish, but how do I show this?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Complex Scalar Field in Terms of Two Independent Real Fields

Loading...

Similar Threads - Complex Scalar Field | Date |
---|---|

I Complex scalar field commutation relations | Aug 9, 2017 |

A Factors in the theory of a complex scalar field | Nov 6, 2016 |

A Complex scalar field - commutation relations | Sep 18, 2016 |

Current of Complex scalar field | Nov 1, 2014 |

Lagrangian density for a complex scalar field (classical) | Dec 7, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**