1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Complimentary Unitary Operators

  1. Oct 23, 2011 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Consider a quantum system that acts on an N-dimensional space. We showed that any operator could be expressed as a polynomial of the form
    [tex]
    O=\sum_{m,n=1}^{\infty}o_{mn}U^m V^n
    [/tex]
    where [itex]U[/itex] and [itex]V[/itex] are complementary unitary operators satisfying [itex](U^N = V^N =1)[/itex] Show that if [itex]O[/itex] commutes with [itex]U[/itex] this polynomial can only be a function of [itex]U[/itex]; if [itex]O[/itex] commutes with [itex]V[/itex] this polynomial can only be a function of [itex]V[/itex]; and if [itex]O[/itex] commutes with [itex]U[/itex] and [itex]V[/itex] this polynomial must be a constant times the identity


    2. Relevant equations
    [tex]UV=VU e^{i2\pi /N}[/tex]
    [tex]V^n U=UV^n e^{i2\pi n/N}[/tex]


    3. The attempt at a solution
    Me and some buddies thought we had a solution to this, but then another clever buddy pointed out something that we are all unsure of... can a fellow PF lurker lend a hand here

    I solved this by assuming the commutation and writing it out explicitly and using the above relavent equations
    [tex]
    [O,U]=\sum_{m,n=1}^{N}o_{mn}(U^m V^n U-UU^m V^n)=\sum_{m,n=1}^{N}o_{mn}U^{m+1}V^n (e^{i2\pi n/N}-1)=0
    [/tex]
    I then confidently took
    [tex]
    e^{i2\pi n/N}=1\implies n=N
    [/tex]
    which, as stated in the beginning, makes [itex]V^n=V^N=1[/itex] which gives me my polynomial in terms of [itex]U[/itex] only.

    Now here is the confusion, there is a summation there in my solution, which seems to make my solution incorrect, since what I wrote doesn't need to be true, just that the sum of the terms needs to add up to zero. Are we missing something obvious, or is that solution simply not valid?

    Thanks in advance,
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 24, 2011 #2
    I would hazard that powers of operators are independent from each other just like normal variables so that absorbing the n dependent factor into the coefficients gives you a statement about the independence of powers of operators

    [tex] \Sigma_{m,n=1}^{N} o_{mn} U^{m+1} V^{n} (e^{i2 \pi n/N} - 1) = \Sigma_{m,n=1}^{N} o' (n)_{mn} U^{m+1} V^{n} = 0 [/tex]

    which is only satisfied when n=N, otherwise O is not general, and so the sum is irrelevant

    Hope it is clear
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Complimentary Unitary Operators
  1. Unitary operator U ? (Replies: 3)

Loading...