• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Conceptual Question - Inertia

  • Thread starter loka
  • Start date
  • #1
14
0

Homework Statement



The Mass of an object doesn't affect the angle at which a curve must be banked. The law of inertia, however, states that the motion of any object is affected by its inertia, w/c depends on its mass. How can objects rounding banked curves obey the law of inertia if the amount of banking required for a curve of a given radius of curvature and speed is independent of mass?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Totally clueless! >.<

I just know it has something to do with N1:

Newton's first law of motion states that "An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force."

...and Fc=mv2/R
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
Ok, so mv^2/r is the centripetal acceleration that needs to be balanced by a frictional force. How does the equation for that frictional force depend on m?
 
  • #3
14
0
hmmm ok...so

Fc = mv2/R

Ff = mu*Fn
= mu*mg

Fc = Ff
mv2/R = mu*mg

so the masses cancel out?

...the thing is I dont even get what the question is asking?
 
  • #4
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
Yes, the mass cancels out. Isn't that what the question is asking? There should be an angle in your friction but that's not even terribly important. The acceleration is proportional to mass and so is the friction.
 
  • #5
14
0
but am i not just proving what was already stated in the question? Which is that radius and speed don't rely on mass?

I'm just terribly confused of the question...shouldn't I incorporate N1 in my conclusion but I just don't seem to get it...
 
  • #6
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
I think you should read the question again. It looks to me like it's asking why is the banking angle independent of mass if the inertia is dependent on mass. If the mass cancels, isn't that the answer? Am I reading it wrong? How are you reading it?
 
  • #7
14
0
Oooo that makes more sense...thanks for rephrasing it!

maybe I was just complicating the question...

Thanks again for your help. ^^,
 

Related Threads for: Conceptual Question - Inertia

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
486
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
994
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Top