Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Concerning psi and black holes

  1. Aug 5, 2005 #1
    According to quantum theory the total probability of finding the particle somewhere in space is always zero. So if a particle vanishes in a black hole will that mean (psi)^2 = 0, which is illegal?
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 5, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Say what?

    What version of "quantum theory" is this? Can you give an exact citation where you read this?

  4. Aug 5, 2005 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think s/he meant one, not zero.
  5. Aug 5, 2005 #4
    i'm going to assume that the poster meant 1, and not 0.

    I don't know if you'll find a sufficient answer to your question...if a particle falls into a black hole, is it still in this universe? if yes, then the probability density over all space holds. if not, then is it even relevant, since the equation says nothing about this?

    so a) i dont think that your scenario violates the equation and b) i also don't think that we can even speculate since, to my knowledge, black holes are still largely not understood entities.
  6. Aug 5, 2005 #5
    At the risk of re-railing this thread, I think over time the integrated probability
    of the particle being found outside the black hole would decrease, so yes
    the hole would be "sucking up" [tex]\Psi[/tex]. If this is true, the inside of the hole should
    be considered part of the "Universe" but an inaccessible part.

    Let me add a serious twist to the question. What happens if one member
    of an entangled pair of particles falls in? If even light can't escape, can
    a measuement "from beneath" the event horizon bring about a new quantum state which
    is still correlated with it's partner outside the black hole?

    Conservation laws say it must.

    General relativity says no information can come out of the hole. So
    how does the change in the wavefunction take place outside based
    on something that happens to the particle's correlated pair inside?
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2005
  7. Aug 5, 2005 #6


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Yes, and even in that case, this is only the case in NON-relativistic QM - of a single particle - so we are far from a treatment where we have black holes :-)

    I think that the answer is hence two-fold: the "psi defined everywhere and normalized to unity" is a concept that comes from non-relativistic quantum mechanics and hence not applicable to the situation at hand as such. Nevertheless, the crux of the problem remains, formulated differently: how can the motion of matter be described by a unitary operator in a black hole geometry (which is supposed to be reversible). That's the famous "quantum information riddle at a black hole".
    As far as I know, we don't have a fully working theory of that. But some bricolage seems to show that the problem goes away (I think Hawking recently lost an encyclopedia over it, in a bet with another one) when you consider superpositions of "more or less flat space" and "hole forms and evaporates". These are exotic superpositions indeed, but I think Hawking had some indications that the overall operation can be unitary.
  8. Aug 6, 2005 #7
    Yes, he lost it to John Preskill. He was so glad he won, he dedicated part of his personal website to it :)

    Preskill's VICTORY

  9. Aug 6, 2005 #8
    I dont know what I was thinking when i wrote zero!!! I meant one.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Concerning psi and black holes
  1. Black Holes (Replies: 2)