Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Condition for equilibrium

  1. Jan 28, 2012 #1
    Can a body be in equilibrium if only one force acts on it? I think it can't, if the force is non-zero. Thoughts?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 28, 2012 #2

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    What do you think?
     
  4. Jan 28, 2012 #3
    Re: Condition for (force) equilibrium

    The following is what "failexam" thought:

     
  5. Jan 28, 2012 #4

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Makes sense to me.
     
  6. Jan 28, 2012 #5
    Well, I think the body can't be in equilibrium. That's the obvious answer. But I'm wondering if this might be a trick question. So ...
     
  7. Jan 28, 2012 #6
    I see. Not a trick question, then!
     
  8. Jan 28, 2012 #7
    Perhaps there is a twist to this question.

    Can a body be said to have only one force acting one it?

    Considering that any force can be resolved into component forces.

    So perhaps we could talk about one net force or a non zero resultant or that there is a (single) resultant.

    You have entitled this thread 'conditions for equilibrium' , so presumably that is what you are reading.

    So perhaps the text is a bit slack and should read something like the conditions for a body to be in force equilibrium is that the resultant of any applied forces is zero or that the components are separately zero.
    Moment equilibrium is something else again that should be considered.
     
  9. Jan 28, 2012 #8

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I think the question is clear enough. A single non-zero force acts on a body. (Sure, you can break that force into components, but so what?) Can the body be in equilibrium? No.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Condition for equilibrium
  1. Rotation condition? (Replies: 1)

  2. Gauge condition (Replies: 3)

Loading...