Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

This is related to my previous https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=392069"

Let [tex] A=(a_{ij}) [/tex] be a symmetric (i.e., over reals) PSD matrix with the following conditions on Leading Principle Minors (determinant of the submatrix consisting of first i rows and i columns) [tex] A_{ii}[/tex]:

[tex] A_{11}\ge0,~ A_{22}=A_{44}= A_{66}=A_{77}=A_{88}=detA=0 [/tex]

Now the question is can I say (from the above information) that [tex] A_{33}=A_{55}=0 ?[/tex] From "Matrix Analysis" by Horn and Johnson, I guess theInterlacing Inequlitymay be useful...but I don't know much about it. Any help, please.

As usual, will it still valid if I assume A to be hermitian (i.e., over complex) than being symmetric?

Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Condition on Leading principle minors of a symmetric Positive semidefinite(PSD) matri

Loading...

Similar Threads - Condition Leading principle | Date |
---|---|

A Reality conditions on representations of classical groups | Jan 29, 2018 |

I Linear Algebra Conditions | Feb 15, 2017 |

I Difference Equation Boundary Conditions0. | Oct 10, 2016 |

Characteristic polynomial has degree n and leading coefficent (-1)^n | Jul 22, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**