So my teacher said that when proving something, I can't start out with what I'm trying to prove. But what if it is an "if this than that proof"(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For example,

If A(squared)=A, then I-A=(I-A)inverse

Well, I started using what I'm trying to prove by multiplying both sides by I-A

I get (I-A)squared=I

implies I-4A+4AA=I

implies I-4A+4A=I b/c A(squared)=A using the hypothesis

implies I+0=I

implies I=I both sides equal

The thing is that I have proven that if AA=A, then I-A=(I-A)inverse by using the hypothesis somewhere in the solution. Would this be a logical conclusion?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Confused about this logic

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**