So my teacher said that when proving something, I can't start out with what I'm trying to prove. But what if it is an "if this than that proof"(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For example,

If A(squared)=A, then I-A=(I-A)inverse

Well, I started using what I'm trying to prove by multiplying both sides by I-A

I get (I-A)squared=I

implies I-4A+4AA=I

implies I-4A+4A=I b/c A(squared)=A using the hypothesis

implies I+0=I

implies I=I both sides equal

The thing is that I have proven that if AA=A, then I-A=(I-A)inverse by using the hypothesis somewhere in the solution. Would this be a logical conclusion?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Confused about this logic

Loading...

Similar Threads - Confused logic | Date |
---|---|

A Modular forms, dimension and basis confusion, weight mod 1 | Nov 23, 2016 |

I Confused about basis vector notation | Mar 29, 2016 |

I Confused on definition of projection | Mar 12, 2016 |

Confusion about eigenvalues of an operator | Feb 21, 2016 |

Proving dependent columns when the rows are dependent | Sep 3, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**