1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Confused on how they derived this

  1. Mar 25, 2006 #1


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The book im using did a simple little algebra and it is showing the quantized energy levels of an electron in a one-dimensional atom of width 0.1nm.

    They did this:

    E_n = n^2 \frac{{h^2 }}{{8ml^2 }} \\
    E_n = n^2 \frac{{h^2 c^2 }}{{8mc^2 l^2 }} \\
    E_n = n^2 \frac{{(1239.8eV*nm)^2 }}{{(8)(0.511*10^6 eV)(0.1nm)^2 }} \\

    But where did the c^2 go on top?
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 26, 2006 #2

    Physics Monkey

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The [tex] c [/tex] has been put with the [tex] h [/tex] to give something with units of [tex] [E][T]\frac{[L]}{[T]} = [E][L] [/tex], and numerically [tex] h c = 1239.8[/tex] eV nm. This is one of those common estimation factors, although I remember it as [tex] \hbar c \sim 200 [/tex] eV nm.
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2006
  4. Mar 26, 2006 #3


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Oh ok i get why they did this. They have a conversion at the front of the book for hc = (1239.8eV*nm) that i didn't notice or make the connection to.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?