Confusion about the thermal interpretation's account of measurement

In summary, the conversation discusses two different interpretations of quantum mechanics, known as the first and second story. The first story involves a macroscopic superposition arising from the linearity of the Schrödinger equation, while the second story involves a reduced density matrix and a deterministic evolution of the detector's position. The second story can be explained within the formal core of quantum mechanics, but the thermal interpretation provides a better understanding of individual cases. The fuss about interpretations stems from the assumption that macroscopic systems can be described by a pure state, which the thermal interpretation refutes. The second story cannot solve the measurement problem, as it still relies on the eigenvalue link to measurement. The thermal interpretation, on the other
  • #71
A. Neumaier said:
Within the thermal interpretation it is considered to be in a mixed state. Indeed, the experimental record tells us that the universe has a positive temperature, whereas no temperature can be assigned to a pure state.
What is considered to be in a mixed state? The entire universe? Well, why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #72
vanhees71 said:
What is considered to be in a mixed state? The entire universe?
yes, its state was under discussion. Assigning to the universe a temperature distribution (microwave background) means that the state of the universe is approximately a local equilibrium state and hence a mixed state.
 
  • #73
Well, the microwave background temperature is a very much coarse grained observable. It's about the large-scale "average" structure of the universe, described by an FLRW metric using the above considered assumption of the cosmological principle to extrapolate it to "the entire (observable) universe". In this sense it's a paradigmatic example for the concept to consider coarse-graining to understand the classical behavior of macroscopic observables of a many-body system.
 

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
84
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
47
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
9
Replies
309
Views
8K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
11
Views
660
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top