1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Confusion about -x^n

  1. Nov 15, 2013 #1
    Hello,

    This is my first post here. I am sorry if this is the wrong place for this question or if my phrasing is unclear.

    -x^n≠(-x)^n
    -x^n=-(x^2)

    I am slightly confused by this because at the level I am at right now (i.e. pre-calculus) and before, I have seen statements that contradict this. For example, I feel like I have been told from beginning algebra until now that -2^2=4. When is this true and when is it not?

    I suppose it is a matter of notation?

    Thank you.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 15, 2013 #2

    FeDeX_LaTeX

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Depends on how you place the parentheses.

    ##(-2)^2 = (-2) \cdot (-2) = 4##
    ##-(2^2) = -[(2) \cdot (2)] = -4##

    In general, ##-(x^n) = (-x)^n## if n is an odd integer.
     
  4. Nov 15, 2013 #3
    Thank you for your swift response.

    If there are no parentheses, what is assumed? Or does that vary from text to text?
     
  5. Nov 15, 2013 #4

    FeDeX_LaTeX

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I'd say that if there are no parentheses given, it's safe to assume that they mean ##-x^n = -(x^n)##, unless they explicitly say otherwise.
     
  6. Nov 15, 2013 #5

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    Probably a typo in the 2nd equation. I guess you mean -x^n = -(x^n).
    You should not have been told that -22 = 4. You might be misremembering what was said in class.
    I edited my earlier response. What you're saying is correct, FedEx_LaTeX, but you don't need the qualifier. ##-x^n## and ##-(x^n)## mean exactly the same thing.

    According to the operator precedence, exponents are evaluated before signs.
    -xn means the opposite of xn, or -(xn). If you want to raise -x to a power you have to include parentheses around the thing being raised to the power, like this: (-x)n.
     
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2013
  7. Nov 15, 2013 #6
    In addition, be careful about the first statement that you made.
    -xn≠(-x)n does not hold for all n and x that you are used to using.
    This statement is FALSE for all odd n. There is also some x for which this is false.
     
  8. Nov 15, 2013 #7
    Mark, I believe what you've written agrees with what FeDeX wrote.
     
  9. Nov 15, 2013 #8

    Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    I now see that, and have revised what I wrote in that thread. My only excuse is that the "unless they explicitly say otherwise" part threw me off.

    I'm so used to seeing people write, for example, -22 = +4, that I thought (erroneously, mea culpa) that that's what FedEx_LaTeX was saying. Hopefully, things are clear now.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Confusion about -x^n
  1. Confused about i (Replies: 18)

Loading...