Confusion from Weinberg's QFT

  • #1
123
0
Hello, a confusion has arose during my so far study of the above book.

According to the composition rule (2.3.11) it should be: [itex]U\left( \Lambda ,a \right)=U\left( \mathbf{1},a \right)U\left( \Lambda \right)[/itex] and according to transformation law (2.5.3) and the eigenvalue equation which follows (2.5.1), it should be:

[itex]U\left( \Lambda ,a \right){{\Psi }_{p,\sigma }}={{e}^{-i\left( \Lambda p \right)\cdot a}}\sum\limits_{{{\sigma }'}}{{{C}_{{\sigma }'\sigma }}\left( \Lambda ,p \right){{\Psi }_{\Lambda p,{\sigma}' }}}[/itex]​

Right? If yes, then my question is: how are the above compatible with eq. (3.1.1), since the phase factor that appears in the beginning of the RHS of this equation, contains the untrasformed four-momentums of the particles? Shouldn’t the phase of this factor be the following:

[itex]-i{{a}_{\mu }}\left[ {{\left( \Lambda {{p}_{1}} \right)}^{\mu }}+{{\left( \Lambda {{p}_{2}} \right)}^{\mu }}+... \right][/itex]
???

Thank' s in advance for your replies
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Bill_K
Science Advisor
Insights Author
4,155
195
Isn't that what it is? That's what it says in my book. Maybe there was a misprint that got corrected.
 
  • #3
123
0
Then obviously my print has some mistakes. Thank’ s a lot Bill_K , now I can continue my study…
 

Related Threads on Confusion from Weinberg's QFT

  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Top