Everyone knows by now that a conic section is the figure formed when a plane intersects a right circular cone. Most everyone also knows that there are many different ways to describe a conic, geometrically and algebraically. What one seldom sees is the derivation of those descriptions from the fundamental definition. Using Dandelin Spheres it is easy to accomplish this for an ellipse. What I have never seen is a proof, based on the fundamental definition, of the equivalence of the ratio of the distances of a point on the conic to the focus and to the directrix, or even a definition of the directrix itself. Can anyone supply or direct me to such information? Thanks.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Conic sections

Loading...

Similar Threads - Conic sections | Date |
---|---|

I Question inspired by reviewing conic sections | Mar 9, 2017 |

I Determine if an equation describes a conic section | May 19, 2016 |

How to find type of conic section from its general equation? | Feb 23, 2012 |

Degenerate Conic Sections | Mar 13, 2011 |

Method to find the centre of a conic section from its equation | Oct 23, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**