1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Conservation law

  1. Jul 24, 2009 #1
    Statement:
    Couls someone explain the following equation to me:
    [tex]\int \int_{surface} \vec{J} \cdot \vec{ds} = -\frac{\partial Q_{enclosed}}{\partial t},[/tex] where [tex]\vec{J_{v}}[/tex] is the electric current density.


    Question:
    I am more confused with the term on the right side. The left side simply determines the current density on some surface, and that is why it is a surface integral.

    But the right side says the surface has a negative current density. Why can't we just take the negative sign off, and assume if the resulting answer is less than the initial conditions, then the charge density in a particular region has decreased? Can someone either explain this to me, or provide an example.


    Thanks,


    Jeffrey
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 24, 2009 #2

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It's because ds is the OUTWARD pointing normal of the surface. If the current flow is outward from the sphere then the left side is positive because J.ds is positive. But that corresponding to decreasing charge in the sphere.
     
  4. Jul 24, 2009 #3
    So the right term corresponds to how much charge from the enclosed surface has left per unit time t. Not how much charge remains in the closed surface after a unit time?
     
  5. Jul 24, 2009 #4

    Redbelly98

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yes, that's correct.

    The charge that remains would simply be Qenclosed.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook