Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Contest Math v.s. Real Math?

  1. Nov 23, 2008 #1
    Hi, all!

    I was wondering: is research mathematics (the stuff real professionals do) anything like contest mathematics? I know contest math is usually extremely hard and requires ingenuity, but does mathematics at, say, the graduate level require more mathematical ability/ingenuity than the "toy" problems prevalent in elementary math based contest math?

    I'm a math "newbie", so I'm not all too privy to the distinction between contest math and the real world!

    (note: when I say "contest math", I mean things like USAMO/IMO, etc. -- the highest level stuff)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 23, 2008 #2
    Don't know about that but my current math teacher always says "Its not problem solving if you seen the problem before!!!"

    So I'm guess you don't need to be brilliant at math to study it. If you love it then do it...
     
  4. Nov 23, 2008 #3
    Bright Wang,

    I'm not sure what you mean?
     
  5. Nov 23, 2008 #4

    Vid

    User Avatar

    Most of the contest math problems revolve around finding a simple trick using mostly elementary mathematics under time constraints. Graduate students and professional mathematicians have to learn, relearn, and coherently organize large volumes of mathematical theory with hopes of somehow extending, even in some insignificant way, this body of knowledge.
     
  6. Nov 24, 2008 #5
    Contest math is quite a bit different than research math, but many of the same skills are used. I went to the last IMO and plan to go this time too, but just because it's a great experience and you meet interesting people. I don't expect to use many of the weird factorization techniques I know, but I certainly think that contest math has helped me solve problems, including non-contest and even non-mathematical problems, better. For some good advice see:
    http://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/advice-on-mathematics-competitions/
     
  7. Nov 24, 2008 #6

    Hurkyl

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    My opinion is that being good at contest math isn't enough to have the deep insights to solve hard problems -- but it will mean that you are very good at connecting the dots, and thus at assembling deep insights into useful theorems.
     
  8. Nov 24, 2008 #7

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    As in all research, the MAJOR distinguishing feature of "real math" relative to contest math, is to be able to FORMULATE a solvable, and interesting, problem.
     
  9. Nov 24, 2008 #8

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    good point, problem finding, and problem posing, are crucial research skills nit represented in most contests, although there is no reason contests could not become more extended in scope. the purpose of a contest is to engage young people in a fun activity, so the problems are purposely chosen to be challenging but not to be completely discouragingly impossible. In actual research you are up against nature and the problems have no ceiling in difficulty.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Contest Math v.s. Real Math?
  1. Math Contest Question (Replies: 3)

  2. Math Contest Questions (Replies: 1)

  3. Contest math material? (Replies: 4)

  4. Waterloo math contest (Replies: 1)

Loading...