Why are neither sin(x^-1) nor xsin(x^-1) continuous at x=0?

In summary, sin(x^-1) is not continuous because it does not satisfy the definition of continuous while xsin(x^-1) is.
  • #1
coverband
171
1
How come sin(x^-1) is not continuous and xsin(x^-1) is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Calling something a function, and saying it is continuous, all require you to specify what the domains are that you're talking about. Any domain that I can reasonably use to make sin(1/x) a function mean it is continuous.

I suspect that you want to define it as sin(1/x) for x=/=0 and 0 when x=0, as a function from R to R.

It isn't then continuous because it fails to satisfy the definition of continuous.

If you want to prove this, then use the sequential definition of limit - it should be an easy and illuminating exercise.
 
  • #3
In the sequential definition of a limit, n approaches infinity and we show there exists a natural number, say p, such that n>=p implies |f(n)-L| < epsilon

Do you mean to prove sin(x^-1) is not continuous we show we cannot find a real number r, such that x<=r implies
|sin(x^-1) -0|< epsilon ?
 
  • #4
coverband said:
In the sequential definition of a limit, n approaches infinity and we show there exists a natural number, say p, such that n>=p implies |f(n)-L| < epsilo

Do you mean to prove sin(x^-1) is not continuous we show we cannot find a real number r, such that x<=r implies
|sin(x^-1) -0|< epsilon ?

That is NOT a definition of "continuous". For one thing a function is defined to be continuous at specific points. That would be, if n is not constrained to be an integer, the definition of "limit as x goes to infinity". Since functions are not defined "at infinity" what you give is not even a definition of "continuous at infinity" (since no such thing exists).

A function is continuous at x= a if [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)[/itex], f(a) exists, and [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= f(a)[/itex]. A function is not continuous at x= a if anyone of those is not true. A function is said to be "continuous" if it is continuous at every value of x.

At what value of x is sin(x-1) not continuous?
 
  • #5
Yeah. I think when proving continuity its similar to the proof of a limit. In the case of sin (x^-1) our epsilon will always be smaller than our delta rather than the other way around which is what is required to prove the existence of a limit/continuity. Is this correct !?
 
  • #6
?? There is nothing said about "epsilon" or "delta" being smaller in the definition of a limit. We only require that "given epsilon" there exist delta with such that if
|x- a|< delta, then |f(x)-f(a)|< epsilon. You need to go back and check the definitions of both "limit" and "continuous".
 
  • #7
so in the case of sin(x^-1)
|x| < delta must imply |sin(x^-1)| < epsilon which is impossible because...?
 
  • #8
First, as has been said before, just "sin(x-1)" is not continuous at x= 0 because it is not DEFINED there. The more important point is that that is not a "removable discontinuity"- it cannot be defined at x= 0 in any way that will make it continuous. And that is because no matter how small delta is, between 0 and delta, sin(1/x) will take on all the values sin(y) does for y between 1/delta and infinity. (You have 0< x< delta so 1/delta< 1/x< infinity and you can take y= 1/x.)

At some points larger than 1/delta, you will have values of y such that sin(y)= 1 and some at which sin(y)= -1. That means that for 0< x< delta, you will have some values of x so that sin(1/x)= 1 and some for which sin(1/x)= -1. As soon as you take epsilon< 1/2, you can't have |sin(1/x)-L|< epsilon for any delta. If |1- L|< 1/2, |-1- L|= |1+ L| can't be less than 1/2.

Now, f(x)= xsin(1/x) is also no continuous at x= 0 because it is not defined there. However, that is now a "removable discontinuity". While sin(1/x) takes on all possible values between -1 and 1 because it does stay between them, we now have -x<= x sin(1/x)<= x. And x itself goes to 0. [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} x sin(1/x)= \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} x= 0. Defining f(0)= 0, f(x)= x sin(1/x) if x is not 0, makes it a continuous function at 0 and so for all x.
 
  • #9
HallsofIvy said:
At some points larger than 1/delta, you will have values of y such that sin(y)= 1 and some at which sin(y)= -1. That means that for 0< x< delta, you will have some values of x so that sin(1/x)= 1 and some for which sin(1/x)= -1. As soon as you take epsilon< 1/2, you can't have |sin(1/x)-L|< epsilon for any delta. If |1- L|< 1/2, |-1- L|= |1+ L| can't be less than 1/2.

Yeah like there's no value of x (say p) such that

|x|<p implies |sin(x^-1)|<1/2
 
  • #10
sin(x^-1) and xsin(x^-1)

Let us look at the graphs of these functions.

sin(x^-1) OSCILLATES between -1 and +1 on the y axis
it takes the value 1 at x = 0.67, 0.22, 0.133...
Therefore if we have a restriction like you mentioned say epsilon < 1/2 there is no RANGE of values of x < p as every so often the corresponding y value (sin(x^-1)) will jump to 1

However looking at xsin(x^-1) this is like the standard sine graph DAMPED approaching zero. In this case we can set up a range of values for delta, limited by a restriction on epsilon
 
  • #11
so in short, sin(1/x) is NOT continuous even if it is defined by f(x)=0 when x=0? and xsin(1/x) IS continuous if defined by f(x)=0 when x=0? am I right or wrong...sorry I have the same problem understanding this
 
  • #12
sin(1/x) is no continuous because of you let x_n = 1/2npi

sin(1/x_n) =0

If x_n = 1/ (pi/2 +2npi)

sin(1/x_n) = 1.
A slightly naive explanation of this is that...
Basically your function has two different subsequencial limits although x_n -> 0. So depending on the way zero is approached you have different limits which means your function cannot possible be continous.
 
  • #13
coverband said:
How come sin(x^-1) is not continuous and xsin(x^-1) is?
In case the point hasn't been made clearly, NEITHER of these functions is continuous at x= 0. x sin(x^-1) has a removable discontinuity at x= 0. The function defined by "f(x)= x sin(x^-1) if x is not 0: and "f(0)= 0" is continuous for all x but that is no longer the same function.
 

1. What is continuity analysis?

Continuity analysis is a method used in research and data analysis to examine the changes and patterns in a particular phenomenon or event over time. It involves studying the consistency and flow of data points or observations to identify trends, gaps, and potential disruptions.

2. What types of data can be analyzed using continuity analysis?

Continuity analysis can be applied to a wide range of data, including numerical, categorical, and qualitative data. It can also be used to analyze both quantitative and qualitative variables, such as time series data, survey responses, and textual data.

3. What are the main steps in conducting a continuity analysis?

The main steps in conducting a continuity analysis include identifying the research question, selecting appropriate data and variables, cleaning and organizing the data, visualizing the data using graphs or charts, and interpreting the results to draw conclusions.

4. How is continuity analysis different from other data analysis methods?

Continuity analysis differs from other data analysis methods, such as regression analysis or trend analysis, in that it focuses on the overall flow and consistency of data over time, rather than specific relationships or patterns. It also allows for the detection of potential disruptions or changes in trends, rather than just analyzing existing trends.

5. What are some potential applications of continuity analysis?

Continuity analysis has various applications in different fields, such as economics, social sciences, and environmental studies. It can be used to analyze market trends, population changes, policy impacts, and natural disasters, among others. It can also be used in forecasting and decision-making processes to identify potential risks and opportunities.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
843
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
706
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top