Contradictory item is the only one that surely exists

  • Thread starter eighth man
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of a contradictory item or entity that exists in the universe and does not depend on any reasoning to exist. This item is described as being able to deceive all logic and reasoning, making it the most sure thing to exist because it can escape any logical constraints. However, the idea of only contradictory entities existing is counterintuitive and goes against the evidence of rational thought and behavior in nature. This conversation does not meet the guidelines for a philosophical discussion.
  • #1
eighth man
18
0
A contradictory item (or concept, or object ) is the only one that exists in the universe because it can deceive all logic and reasoning and as such does not depend on any reasoning to exist.

If contradictory item A is such that A=3 and also A=17, and A exists and A also does not exist, then A is the most sure thing to exist because it can always escape any logic regarding its existence. Its existence does not depend on any logic any rule or any constraint, not even the one of being true or false. It is hard to reason with this item because all reasoning breaks down, but this proves that it is the most sure thing possible, since nothing can contradict it, as it actually accepts and thrives on contradiction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
eighth man said:
A contradictory item (or concept, or object ) is the only one that exists in the universe because it can deceive all logic and reasoning and as such does not depend on any reasoning to exist.

You imply here that "Rational entities depend on reasoning in order to exist," and you assert that "Only contradictory (irrational) entities exist." Taken together, these statements imply that no rational things exist and (perhaps) that there is no rational thought. Obviously rational thought exists, however, and science wouldn't be possible if nature didn't behave in a rational way.

Besides making apparently false claims, you make a rather counterintuitive claim about how it is that things exist. It's not at all clear why it would (or could) be that anything depends on reasoning in order to exist, in the sense you seem to be implying here. Perhaps you could maintain that sort of position with some kind of convoluted idealism. However, strong claims require strong evidence, and there is none here (and I really don't see how there could be any, even in principle, given what we know about nature). Ultimately, this thread doesn't meet the philosophy forum guidelines on a number of counts.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


This statement presents an interesting perspective on the concept of existence. While it may be difficult to wrap our minds around the idea of a contradictory item being the only sure thing to exist, there is some truth to this notion.

The idea that a contradictory item can deceive all logic and reasoning means that it exists outside of the limitations of our understanding and perception. It is not bound by any rules or constraints, making it an enigma that cannot be fully comprehended.

In a way, this contradictory item could be seen as a symbol of the unknown and mysterious aspects of the universe. We may never fully understand it, but its existence serves as a reminder that there are things beyond our understanding and that our logic and reasoning can only take us so far.

Ultimately, whether or not we believe in the existence of a contradictory item, this perspective challenges us to expand our thinking and consider the possibility of something existing beyond our current understanding.
 

What does "Contradictory item is the only one that surely exists" mean?

"Contradictory item is the only one that surely exists" refers to the concept that something can exist, even if it appears to contradict itself. This is often seen in paradoxes or philosophical discussions about existence.

How can something be contradictory and still exist?

The idea of something being contradictory is based on our perception and understanding. Just because something appears to be contradictory to us, does not mean it cannot exist in some form or manner. It challenges our understanding of existence and reality.

Can you give an example of a contradictory item that surely exists?

One example could be the concept of time. It is both constantly moving forward, yet can also seem to stand still in certain moments. This contradiction challenges our understanding of time, but it still exists in our lives.

Does the contradictory item have to exist physically or can it be abstract?

The contradictory item can exist in both physical and abstract forms. It can be a tangible object or a concept or idea that challenges our understanding of reality. The key aspect is that it exists, regardless of its form.

Why is the concept of contradictory item being the only one that surely exists significant?

This concept challenges our understanding of existence and reality. It forces us to question our perceptions and beliefs, and opens up new possibilities and perspectives. It also highlights the limitations of our understanding and encourages us to think beyond what we know.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
971
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
571
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
817
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
699
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Back
Top