Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If I have ln{a} converging to ln{b}, can I claim that a converges to b?

I would think yes, because ln is a monotonic function and we are always sure to get a unique value of ln for any argument 'a'. Is that reasoning correct?

I am not able to prove it by the definition of convergence,

By convergence in logarithm we get: ln(a) - ln(b) < \epsilon,

ln{a/b} < \epsilon

a/b < exp{\epsilon}

(a-b)/b < exp{\epsilon} - 1

a-b < b(exp{\epsilon} - 1)

From here I can claim that since \epsilon is near to zero exp{\epsilon} is near to 1 and hence exp{\epsilon} - 1 < \epsilon_1

Thus,

a - b <b \epsilon_1.

Can I claim from here and a converges to b? The presence of b on the right hand side bothers me. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks a lot...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Convergence in logarithms

Loading...

Similar Threads - Convergence logarithms | Date |
---|---|

I Convergence of a recursively defined sequence | Mar 7, 2018 |

I What is this sequence that converges to ln(x) called? | Nov 21, 2017 |

A Gamma function convergence of an integral | Oct 11, 2017 |

B Derivation with logarithms and product | May 27, 2017 |

I Divergence/Convergence for Telescoping series | Mar 25, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**