Could this popular antiseptic be very toxic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MikeX
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Hydrogen peroxide, commonly used as a topical antiseptic, has been criticized for its potential toxicity and negative impact on the healing process. Research indicates that it can damage the outer skin layer and impair fibroblast cells essential for healing. Users have noted longer healing times compared to using antibiotics like neomycin or bacitracin. While hydrogen peroxide is effective in killing bacteria and preventing infections in deeper wounds due to its oxygen-releasing properties, it is still considered toxic, especially at higher concentrations. For superficial wounds, thorough cleaning with soap and water is often sufficient. Concerns about antibiotic resistance highlight the need for careful use of antibiotics, as they may not be effective against all bacteria. Overall, while hydrogen peroxide has its uses, caution is advised due to its potential carcinogenic properties and adverse effects on healing.
MikeX
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I've heard and read a few times before that the popular 3% hydrogen peroxide topical antiseptic solution is very toxic and impedes the healing process, which I ignored a lot of time. Today, I read from a very realiable medical source that many tests have been done and they found out that hydrogen peroxide actually damages the outside layer of the skin and impairs cells called fibroblasts, which is crucial to the healing process. I used hydrogen peroxide a couple of times before and come to think it if, I remember that it took an unusually longer amount of time to heal than if I put some antiboitics like neomycin, gentacmicin, or bactracin on it. There's a very good chance it is very toxic, because at 5% it is a bleaching agent. At 3%, it's foaming action is similar to that of the 5%, so it's still toxic. At any rate, I'm going to stop using hydrogen peroxide for my wounds.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hydrogen peroxide is often (usually) available in 2-3% solution. It is for topical (external use) only, and I have had good experience with it. Hydrogen peroxide is a strong oxidizer. I have found that it promotes healing and kills bacteria that would otherwise infect a wound.
 
A solution containing a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and betadine works very well for flushing out deep wounds showing signs of infection. Peroxide itself is toxic if taken internally, but when you treat a cut with it, the peroxidases in blood rapidly convert it to water and oxygen (that's what that foaming action is). It's most useful in things like puncture wounds or deep cuts where the oxygen prevents anaerobic bacteria from infecting the wound. For more superficial wounds, you don't really need to do much more than wash well with soap and water and keep it clean. The most damage to the tissue surrounding a cut is done by the cut itself, and the inflammation process that accompanies it.

Antibiotics don't all work for all bacteria, and overuse or misuse of antibiotics can lead to antibiotic resistance, so that's not necessarily the best option unless you start to develop an infection that requires treating.
 
hydrogen peroxide is a carcinogen so i won't just pour that over your wound, but then again what doesn't cause cancer these days :rolleyes:
 
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was headed to Europe to study art and painting, but stopped in New York and studied acting. Notable movies include Barefoot in the Park (1967 with Jane Fonda), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969, with Paul Newma), Jeremiah Johnson, the political drama The Candidate (both 1972), The Sting (1973 with Paul Newman), the romantic dramas The Way We Were (1973), and...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
27K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top