1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Counting stars

  1. Feb 11, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    (This is a long problem but I think the question is not hard.)

    Determining the star density from star counts is tough, but estimating counts from a density law is simpler. In practice, this method of fit-ting observed number counts to an assumed density law is becoming a more common approach given the large datasets available. In this problem we will explore counts along the z-axis. For this problem, consider two density laws (to be clear, number densities being considered in this problem which is the total number of something being counted per unit volume). First, 1(||)=0 out to some distance where 0=0.1 −3 is a non-zero constant for ||≤800 and 0=0 for ||>800 . Second, an exponential law in which (||)=0^(-||/ℎ) the same constant 0 and a scale height ℎ=300 . Assume you have isolated a type of star in your counts that you know has an absolute magnitude =3.5 and that you can count stars to a faint magnitude limit =20.5. Finally, assume that we are conducting the counts in a solid angle of 0.05 steradians centered on a Galactic pole.

    With this information you can make a table listing the following information: (i) apparent magnitude from 6.0-20.5 increments of 0.5 mag; (ii) the distance in pc of stars of the type we are counting each magnitude bin; (iii) the volume of space in ^3 contained within each magnitude bin; (iv) the density of stars in ^3 in each magnitude/distance bin according to both density laws and (v) the total number of stars in each magnitude/distance bin according to both density laws. Plot the log of the resulting star counts as a function of magnitude for both density laws.

    2. Relevant equations
    m = M+5(logD-1),where M is the absolute magnitude and m the apparent magnitude, D is the distance between the observer and the star

    3. The attempt at a solution
    for (ii), since we don't know the corresponding M,how do we know the distance? Did I miss something...
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 12, 2016 #2

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    How do you interpret this statement:
    ?
    Sounds to me that you have selected stars with absolute magnitude 3.5, i.e. those are the only stars to be counted. You are in a position to count all of those with apparent magnitude 20.5 or less.
     
  4. Feb 17, 2016 #3
    Oh I didn't see your reply before. Thanks!!! You're right. That makes a lot more sense!!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Counting stars
  1. Counting problem (Replies: 4)

  2. Counting Problem (Replies: 8)

  3. Counting Probability (Replies: 4)

  4. Counting Techniques (Replies: 1)

  5. Sets and counting (Replies: 2)

Loading...