I am not sure where to post this question since it involves GR and particle physics but here it goes.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am reading in a book that when coupling a spinor to gravity, one replaces [itex] \partial_\mu \psi [/tex] by a covariant derivative [itex] D_\mu \psi [/tex] which must transform like a spinor under local lorentz transformations but as a vector under general coordinate transformations. (and does that mean that [itex] \gamma^\mu [/itex] must transform as a vector under GCTs ?)

Can someone explain to me the logic involved here? I know that the D contains an index "mu" which indicates that this should be a vector under GCT's, but I don't really understand the rationale. I don't really understand the physical distinction between the LLT's and the GCT's. I thought that there was only the GCT which included the LLT as special case but this doesn't seem to be the case.

And (and I know this is a different issue), how is it possible to do a GCT in the first place? Imean, the curvature had a physical impact on the geodesics of particles so if I do a GCT that turns a flat region into a curved one, the physics is changed, obviously. So how can the theory be invariant under GCTs?? I know that this is something that bothered Einstein but I never understood the resolution of this issue. Invariance under GCT does not make sense to me since physics seems to be changed.

What does it mean to say that [itex] D_\mu \psi [/itex] must transform as a vector under a GCT? It's not possible to define spinors under GCT?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Coupling spinors to gravity

Loading...

Similar Threads - Coupling spinors gravity | Date |
---|---|

I Dimensionless coupling constant of gravity | Jun 6, 2017 |

A Minimal coupling in general relativity | Apr 16, 2017 |

A Orbital Angular momentum couples to Christoffel connection | Apr 7, 2017 |

I Spinor representation of Lorentz transformations | Mar 14, 2017 |

B A couple of questions on mass increase | Mar 11, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**