Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Covariant LQG

  1. Nov 22, 2006 #1

    Demystifier

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I find the covariant version of loop quantum gravity
    http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc?papernum=0608135
    more appealing than the usual LQG approach.
    What the experts think?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 22, 2006 #2

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Hah! I'll have to look at it. The claims in the abstract seem very persuasive. Livine isn't usually off base, either.
     
  4. Nov 22, 2006 #3

    f-h

    User Avatar

    What I've heard says it's promising but more incomplete from a technical PoV. IIRC there's no well defined Hilbertspace or Loop transform or anything like the usual technical apparatus. You can't do LOST style quantization with it.

    Most people these days work on Spinfoams anyways, for precisely the reasons that Lorentzian LQG would be more attractive (as Livine says this is closely related to BC Spinfoams...)
     
  5. Nov 22, 2006 #4

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award
    Dearly Missed

    f-h, have you heard any reaction to the two-part Randono paper that just appeared? (sorry for the off-topic question, but am eager to get some word on it)
     
  6. Nov 22, 2006 #5

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Just reading the first part of the paper, it seems that covariant LQG is the familiar case of trading a theory that is "bad" in some theoretical sense bu sweet to calculate in, with one that is "purer" but tough to get numbers in. Cue the theme music for AQFT.

    Working with spin foams as if LQG didn't exists doesn't eliminate the Immirzi problem, and the fact that CLQG has spin foams as its quantum states should suggest some motivations for pursuing it. But note that as Livine states, after several years of work it is still limited to kinematic physics, because nobody can figure out how to make dynamics work with the noncommutative inner product.
     
  7. Dec 14, 2006 #6

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award
    Dearly Missed

    Major new CLQG paper

    http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0612071
    Plebanski Theory and Covariant Canonical Formulation
    Sergei Alexandrov, Eric Buffenoir, Philippe Roche
    18 pages

    "We establish an equivalence between the Hamiltonian formulation of the Plebanski action for general relativity and the covariant canonical formulation of the Hilbert-Palatini action. This is done by comparing the symplectic structures of the two theories through the computation of Dirac brackets. We also construct a shifted connection with simplified Dirac brackets, playing an important role in the covariant loop quantization program, in the Plebanski framework. Implications for spin foam models are also discussed."

    Alexandrov got his PhD in Paris around 2003 and went to Utrecht, now he seems to have moved to Montpellier.
    Alexandrov has been the main pusher for CLQG. He has collaborated some with Etera Livine and, IIRC, Freidel.

    Roche was the co-organizer with Carlo Rovelli of the Loops '04 conference at Marseille.
    Roche and Buffenoir have both been at Montpellier for a long time and have collaborated a lot, IIRC. They have impressed me as smart and especially sharp mathematically. Karim Noui was a young collaborator with them for a while and then went to Penn State. Having Alexandrov collaborate with Roche and Buffenoir on CLQG seems to me to put it on the map in a new way----it establishes the probable importance of CLQG.

    (Which the people on this PF thread seemed to have suspected already :smile: )

    ============================

    BTW Kirill Krasnov recently posted a paper employing the Plebanski formulation. Here is something about it
    https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1177248&postcount=544
    there is a video in the Perimeter archive PIRSA #06110041
    and there is a preprint
    http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0611182
    Renormalizable Non-Metric Quantum Gravity?

    Here is the abstract. I think it is the same abstract for the video seminar talk and for the preprint:

    "We argue that four-dimensional quantum gravity may be essentially renormalizable provided one
    relaxes the assumption of metricity of the theory. We work with Plebanski formulation of general
    relativity in which the metric (tetrad), the connection as well as the curvature are all independent
    variables and the usual relations among these quantities are only on-shell. One of the Euler-Lagrange
    equations of this theory guarantees its metricity. We show that quantum corrections generate a
    counterterm that destroys this metricity property, and that there are no other counterterms, at
    least at the one-loop level. There is a new coupling constant that controls the non-metric character
    of the theory. Its beta-function can be computed and is negative, which shows that the non-metricity
    becomes important in the infra red. The new IR-relevant term in the action is akin to a curvature
    dependent cosmological 'constant' and may provide a mechanism for naturally small 'dark energy'."
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2006
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Covariant LQG
  1. Twistors in LQG (Replies: 3)

  2. Existence of LQG (Replies: 20)

  3. The future of LQG (Replies: 43)

  4. LQG Resources ? (Replies: 1)

  5. Particles in LQG (Replies: 4)

Loading...