Critical recorded seminar talk by PF member

  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Member
Your Name]In summary, Frank Hellmann's talk on the reformulation of LQG led by Bianca Dittrich offers a new holonomy formulation for spin foams, extending the theory space of lattice gauge theories and generalizing current spin foam models to arbitrary groups. The accompanying slides and audio provide a clear and concise overview of the research, and interested individuals are encouraged to check out the papers and ILQGS series of talks for more information. The involvement of Physics Forums members in this research highlights the value of online communities in promoting scientific discussions and collaborations.
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
Anyone interested in following LQG research may wish to listen to Frank Hellmann's talk.
Download the slides PDF first before starting the audio. He will say when to advance to the next slide as he goes thru the talk. This gives a clear concise overview of a reformulation of LQG led by Bianca Dittrich (MPI-Potsdam and now Perimeter)

Here is my 7 September post about it:
==quote==
Frank Hellmann's 4 September online seminar talk
http://relativity.phys.lsu.edu/ilqgs/hellmann090412.pdf
http://relativity.phys.lsu.edu/ilqgs/hellmann090412.wav
...
...
For more information about the ILQGS series of talks:
http://relativity.phys.lsu.edu/ilqgs/
http://relativity.phys.lsu.edu/ilqgs/schedulefa12.html
==endquote==

We can be a little proud that several of today's most active Loop researchers have been PF members and have posted (some quite a lot) over the past several years--e.g. Hellmann, Vidotto, Corichi, Livine...Hellmann's talk is about 3 papers, one of which has already appeared on Arxiv, the other two expected to appear soon. People who occasionally come with questions like "what is LQG" or who comment on possibly outmoded versions they have read about may want to check these papers out as they appear..

* B. Bahr, B. Dittrich, FH, W. Kaminski:
Holonomy Spin Foam Models: Definition and coarse graining.
(arxiv:1208:3388),
Holonomy Spin Foam Models: Boundary Hilbert spaces and canonical dynamics. (arxiv:soon)
* FH, W. Kaminski:
Holonomy Spin Foam Models: Asymptotic Dynamics of EPRL type
models.
(arxiv: soon+ε)

The authors are at Perimeter, MPI-Potsdam (Albert Einstein Institute), and Cambridge DAMPT. The abstract for the first of the three papers is:
==quote==
We propose a new holonomy formulation for spin foams, which naturally extends the theory space of lattice gauge theories. This allows current spin foam models to be defined on arbitrary two–complexes as well as to generalize current spin foam models to arbitrary, in particular finite groups. The similarity with standard lattice gauge theories allows to apply standard coarse graining methods , which for finite groups can now be easily considered numerically. We will summarize other holonomy and spin network formulations of spin foams and group field theories and explain how the different representations arise through variable transformations in the partition function. A companion paper will provide a description of boundary Hilbert spaces as well as a canonical dynamic encoded in transfer operators.
==endquote==
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Dear forum members,

I would highly recommend listening to Frank Hellmann's talk on the reformulation of LQG led by Bianca Dittrich. The slides provide a clear and concise overview of the research and the accompanying audio allows for a more in-depth understanding of the topic.

The talk discusses three papers, one of which has already appeared on Arxiv and the other two are expected to be released soon. These papers offer a new holonomy formulation for spin foams, allowing for the extension of the theory space of lattice gauge theories and generalizing current spin foam models to arbitrary groups.

I find this research particularly exciting as it offers new possibilities for numerical simulations and a deeper understanding of the theory. I encourage anyone interested in LQG to check out these papers and the ILQGS series of talks for more information.

It's also worth noting that several of the authors involved in this research are members of the Physics Forums community, including Hellmann, Vidotto, Corichi, and Livine. This serves as a testament to the value of online communities in promoting scientific discussions and collaborations.

Thank you for sharing this information and I look forward to discussing this topic further with anyone who is interested.

 

1. What is a "Critical recorded seminar talk"?

A critical recorded seminar talk is a presentation or lecture given by a member of the PF (physics forums) community that is recorded and made available for others to view. The talk typically covers a specific topic in physics and includes critical analysis and discussion.

2. Who can become a member of the PF community?

Anyone with an interest in physics can join the PF community. It is an open forum for individuals of all levels of expertise, from beginners to professionals.

3. How do PF members choose the topics for their seminar talks?

PF members can choose any topic in physics that they are knowledgeable and passionate about. They may also take suggestions from other members or choose to cover current and relevant research in their field.

4. Are the seminar talks peer-reviewed?

No, the seminar talks on PF are not peer-reviewed. However, members are encouraged to provide constructive criticism and engage in discussions to improve the quality of the talk.

5. Can I participate in the discussions even if I am not a member of PF?

Yes, anyone can view and participate in the discussions on PF without being a member. However, becoming a member allows for more engagement and access to other features of the forum.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Poll
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
14K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
55
Views
11K
Back
Top