Cubical block on a cylinder

  • Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date
  • #1
3,816
92

Homework Statement


A cubical block of side L rests on a fixed cylindrical drum of radius R. Find the largest value of L for which the block is stable.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


There is only one contact point between the cube and cylinder. There are three forces acting on the cube. The normal reaction from the cylinder, the friction and weight. The normal reaction and the friction pass through the contact point. Now how do I form the equations here? :confused:

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • kleppner 6.35.png
    kleppner 6.35.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 711

Answers and Replies

  • #2
6,054
391
It might be easier to find the potential energy due to gravity as a function of the block's tilt angle and then look for its minima.
 
  • #3
3,816
92
It might be easier to find the potential energy due to gravity as a function of the block's tilt angle and then look for its minima.

I calculate potential energy from the line passing through the centre of cylinder.

$$U(\theta)=mg\left(R+\frac{L}{2}\right)(1-\cos \theta)$$
where ##\theta## is the angle rotated by the cylinder.

The minima is at ##\theta=0## and for this ##\theta##, ##U''(\theta)>0## but solving gives me a negative answer which is certainly incorrect. :confused:
 
Last edited:
  • #4
6,054
391
You seem to assume that the block will slide, so that its center of mass is on the line passing through center of the drum and the point of contact. But the block will roll over the drum, and the point of contact will shift.
 
  • #5
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
Consider the following drawing:

attachment.php?attachmentid=64023&stc=1&d=1384699470.gif


Does that suggest an approach? Hint: Consider the difference between the displacement of the point of contact on the face of the block to where the vertical through the center of mass passes through the same face (the line segment named Δ on the enlargement of the right).
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    4.8 KB · Views: 1,636
  • #6
3,816
92
Nice drawing gneill! :smile:

Is ##\Delta=R\theta-(L/2)\tan\theta##?

How do I continue with voko's approach of finding potential energy? I need the distance of CM of cube from centre of cylinder but I don't see how to apply the geometry here. :confused:
 
  • #7
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
Nice drawing gneill! :smile:

Is ##\Delta=R\theta-(L/2)\tan\theta##?
Yes indeed. The answer should be obvious from that...

How do I continue with voko's approach of finding potential energy? I need the distance of CM of cube from centre of cylinder but I don't see how to apply the geometry here. :confused:
In my drawing, extend the radius on the right by L/2 making it a total of R + L/2 in length. Then draw a perpendicular line from its end to the center of mass position. Treat the two as vectors to locate the center of mass.
 
  • #8
3,816
92
Yes indeed. The answer should be obvious from that...

How? :confused:

Do I have to apply the condition that ##\Delta \geq 0##?

In my drawing, extend the radius on the right by L/2 making it a total of R + L/2 in length. Then draw a perpendicular line from its end to the center of mass position. Treat the two as vectors to locate the center of mass.

Please look at the attachment. Are you talking about the vectors shown? I still don't see how can I find the distance of CM from them. :(
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.png
    Fig1.png
    20.5 KB · Views: 906
  • #9
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
How? :confused:

Do I have to apply the condition that ##\Delta \geq 0##?
That's the idea. Consider the direction of the torque provided by the weight of the block about its contact point. Under what conditions is it a restoring force? When is it going to make the angle of tilt increase? When will it be exactly neutral?

Please look at the attachment. Are you talking about the vectors shown? I still don't see how can I find the distance of CM from them. :(

You have the lengths of both, and they are perpendicular. You've even drawn in the hypotenuse!
 
  • #10
BruceW
Homework Helper
3,611
121
I Love these kinds of problems. Problems related to something that you might just be absent-mindedly thinking about, after trying to balance some cereal on a football. Pranav, you always bring nice problems :)
 
  • #11
WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
5,815
543
I Love these kinds of problems. Problems related to something that you might just be absent-mindedly thinking about, after trying to balance some cereal on a football. Pranav, you always bring nice problems :)

They're all from Kleppner and Kolenkow "An Introduction to Mechanics" (this particular one is from the chapter on rotational motion). Go get the book before I mail it to you myself!
 
  • #12
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
37,199
7,297
How? :confused:

Do I have to apply the condition that ##\Delta \geq 0##?
Yes, bearing in mind that this is for arbitrarily small theta. You will need an approximation to get θ and tan θ comparable.
 
  • #13
BruceW
Homework Helper
3,611
121
They're all from Kleppner and Kolenkow "An Introduction to Mechanics" (this particular one is from the chapter on rotational motion). Go get the book before I mail it to you myself!
cool, I might check it out. It seems I've missed out on a real gem here :)
 
  • #14
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
37,199
7,297
There is an ambiguity in the question. The interpretation of 'stable' so far is (I think) that it doesn't tilt at all, but it could be read as not rolling right off (assuming adequate friction).
 
  • #15
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
There is an ambiguity in the question. The interpretation of 'stable' so far is (I think) that it doesn't tilt at all, but it could be read as not rolling right off (assuming adequate friction).

I think the interpretation is that it's "stable" in the same sense that Lagrange Points are stable; A small perturbation induces a small orbit around the point rather than an escape trajectory.

So long as the cubical block is less than a certain size a small perturbation will result in oscillation rather than it tipping off of the cylinder. Larger than that critical size, any small perturbation will result in the angle increasing continuously -- i.e. falling off.
 
  • #16
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
37,199
7,297
I think the interpretation is that it's "stable" in the same sense that Lagrange Points are stable; A small perturbation induces a small orbit around the point rather than an escape trajectory.

So long as the cubical block is less than a certain size a small perturbation will result in oscillation rather than it tipping off of the cylinder. Larger than that critical size, any small perturbation will result in the angle increasing continuously -- i.e. falling off.
Yes, I agree, that's probably what's intended.
There's yet a third question one could ask: what's the largest L for which it is possible to place the block on the cylinder stably? What a rich source of puzzles.
 
  • #17
3,816
92
That's the idea. Consider the direction of the torque provided by the weight of the block about its contact point. Under what conditions is it a restoring force? When is it going to make the angle of tilt increase? When will it be exactly neutral?

Okay, I understand but looking over the sketch again, how did you find that angle between the perpendicular of length L/2 and vertical is ##\theta##? :confused:

You have the lengths of both, and they are perpendicular. You've even drawn in the hypotenuse!

One of the lengths is R+L/2. I fail at determining the second side, Please help.

Just a guess, is it ##R\theta##?

Pranav, you always bring nice problems :)

Thanks BruceW! :smile:

As WBN stated, some problems are from the book "Introduction to Mechanics by David Kleppner" and the other, which is much more interesting (sorry WBN, I prefer Irodov than Kleppner :P ) is this: https://www.amazon.com/dp/8183552153/?tag=pfamazon01-20

The above book is quite popular in India. You must check this and have a look at reviews on Amazon. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
Okay, I understand but looking over the sketch again, how did you find that angle between the perpendicular of length L/2 and vertical is ##\theta##? :confused:
There are numerous right-angles joining the line segments, so anything tilted will make angle θ with respect to either the horizontal or the vertical. The trick is to determine which (w.r.t. horizontal or vertical). Fortunately the shape of the triangles gives a big hint, but even so you could follow the trail of perpendicular lines from the tilted radius vector and label the angles w.r.t. horizontal and vertical as you go. I've added a few annotations to the diagram -- see the thumbnail.

One of the lengths is R+L/2. I fail at determining the second side, Please help.

Just a guess, is it ##R\theta##?
Yes, it must be because the two L/2 length line segments are parallel and the line you want is parallel to the bottom of the cube. The resulting figure is a rectangle.
 

Attachments

  • Fig2.gif
    Fig2.gif
    2.6 KB · Views: 892
  • #19
6,054
391
Okay, I understand but looking over the sketch again, how did you find that angle between the perpendicular of length L/2 and vertical is ##\theta##? :confused:

The cube is tangent to the drum at all times.

One of the lengths is R+L/2. I fail at determining the second side, Please help.

Just a guess, is it ##R\theta##?

Your guess is right. Now try to explain it.
 
  • #20
3,816
92
There are numerous right-angles joining the line segments, so anything tilted will make angle θ with respect to either the horizontal or the vertical. The trick is to determine which (w.r.t. horizontal or vertical). Fortunately the shape of the triangles gives a big hint, but even so you could follow the trail of perpendicular lines from the tilted radius vector and label the angles w.r.t. horizontal and vertical as you go. I've added a few annotations to the diagram -- see the thumbnail.

Nicely explained, thanks gneill! :smile:

Since ##\Delta \geq 0## and ##\theta## is very small, ##L\geq 2R##.

Yes, it must be because the two L/2 length line segments are parallel and the line you want is parallel to the bottom of the cube. The resulting figure is a rectangle.

Umm..I think I did not require it, I need the distance from the reference line to continue with the voko's approach. How do I find that?

What I get is ##(L/2)/\cos(\theta)+\Delta \sin\theta+R-(x+\Delta \cos(\theta))##, is this correct?
 
  • #21
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
Umm..I think I did not require it, I need the distance from the reference line to continue with the voko's approach. How do I find that?

What I get is ##(L/2)/\cos(\theta)+\Delta \sin\theta+R-(x+\Delta \cos(\theta))##, is this correct?

Umm, distance of what from which reference line? Can indicate it on the diagram?
 
  • #22
3,816
92
Umm, distance of what from which reference line? Can indicate it on the diagram?

I have attached a picture.
 

Attachments

  • reference line.png
    reference line.png
    8.1 KB · Views: 431
  • #23
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
The diagram shows a horizontal reference line through the center of the cylinder, but it doesn't indicate what distance you want. Is it the perpendicular distance of the center of mass of the block from that reference line?
 
  • #24
3,816
92
Is it the perpendicular distance of the center of mass of the block from that reference line?

Yes. :)
 
  • #25
gneill
Mentor
20,937
2,878
Okay, more diagram annotations. I draw your attention to the lines in green.

attachment.php?attachmentid=64057&stc=1&d=1384783443.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig3.gif
    Fig3.gif
    3.7 KB · Views: 697

Related Threads on Cubical block on a cylinder

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
345
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top