Solving q(t) for t=1.204 Secs

  • Thread starter Sajjad
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses finding the value of t and current i in a circuit with the given charge flow equation. By taking the derivative and using a formula, the value of t is found to be 1.204 seconds. This value is then used to find the charge, q, by plugging it into the original equation. The conversation also confirms that the process used was correct.
  • #1
Sajjad
5
0
The charge flowing through a circuit is

q(t)=[3e^(-t) - 5e^(-2t)]--------(1)

find the value of t and then current i.
as i=dq/dt.
i am doing it like this

i=-3e^-t + 10e^-2t.....taking derivative

let e^-t=u...for eaze

i=10[u^2-3u/10]

let 1=0 then

10[u^2-3u/10]=0

10[u^2 - 2(u)(3/20) + (3/20)^2 - (3/20)^2]=0 ...using formula

10[u-3/20]^2 - 10[3/20]^2=0

10[u-3/20]^2=10[3/20]^2

10[u-3/20]^2=9/40

[u-3/20]^2=9/400

u-3/20=sqrt[9/400]

u=sqrt[9/400] + 3/20

e^-t = 3/20 + 3/20...as u=e^-t

Taking log on both side

ln[e^-t]= ln[3/10]

-t= -1.204
-----------------|
t= 1.204 seconds |------ am i doing ok till here?
-----------------|
by putting this in equation 1 we will get the vale for charge,q.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sajjad said:
The charge flowing through a circuit is

q(t)=[3e^(-t) - 5e^(-2t)]--------(1)

find the value of t and then current i.
as i=dq/dt.
i am doing it like this

i=-3e^-t + 10e^-2t.....taking derivative

let e^-t=u...for eaze

i=10[u^2-3u/10]

let 1=0 then

10[u^2-3u/10]=0

10[u^2 - 2(u)(3/20) + (3/20)^2 - (3/20)^2]=0 ...using formula

10[u-3/20]^2 - 10[3/20]^2=0

10[u-3/20]^2=10[3/20]^2

10[u-3/20]^2=9/40

[u-3/20]^2=9/400

u-3/20=sqrt[9/400]

u=sqrt[9/400] + 3/20

e^-t = 3/20 + 3/20...as u=e^-t

Taking log on both side

ln[e^-t]= ln[3/10]

-t= -1.204
-----------------|
t= 1.204 seconds |------ am i doing ok till here?
-----------------|
by putting this in equation 1 we will get the vale for charge,q.

How many places are you going to post this question? It's been answered.

-Dan
 
  • #3


Yes, you are on the right track. You have correctly solved for the value of t, which is 1.204 seconds. Now, to find the current i at this time, you can substitute this value of t into the derivative of q(t) that you found earlier: i=-3e^-t + 10e^-2t.

So, plugging in t=1.204 seconds, we get:

i=-3e^-1.204 + 10e^-2(1.204)

i=-3(0.297) + 10(0.108)

i=-0.891 + 1.08

i=0.189 amps

Therefore, at t=1.204 seconds, the current flowing through the circuit is 0.189 amps.

To find the value of charge, q, at this time, you can simply plug in t=1.204 seconds into the original equation for q(t):

q(1.204)=[3e^(-1.204) - 5e^(-2(1.204))]

q(1.204)=[3(0.297) - 5(0.108)]

q(1.204)=0.891 - 0.54

q(1.204)=0.351 coulombs

Therefore, at t=1.204 seconds, the charge flowing through the circuit is 0.351 coulombs.

Overall, your method is correct and you have solved for both the value of t and the corresponding current and charge at that time. Great job!
 

1. What does "q(t)" represent in this equation?

In this equation, "q(t)" represents the position (or quantity) of an object at a specific time, t.

2. Why is it important to solve for t=1.204 seconds?

Solving for a specific time, in this case t=1.204 seconds, allows us to determine the exact position of the object at that moment. This can be helpful in analyzing the motion or behavior of the object.

3. How do you solve for q(t) when t=1.204 seconds?

To solve for q(t) at t=1.204 seconds, we need to have an equation that relates q(t) to t. We can then plug in t=1.204 seconds into the equation and solve for q(t).

4. What are the units for q(t) in this equation?

The units for q(t) in this equation will depend on the specific context of the problem. It could represent distance, volume, or any other quantity. It is important to pay attention to the units to ensure that the equation is being used correctly.

5. Can this equation be used to solve for t at a different value of q(t)?

Yes, this equation can be rearranged to solve for t at a different value of q(t). However, it's important to note that the equation may not be accurate for values of q(t) that are outside of the original context of the problem.

Similar threads

  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
793
Replies
2
Views
614
  • General Math
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • General Math
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
966
Back
Top