Hi guys, i have been tasked with matching the upper a theoretical curve (seen in the picture-blue) to the upper experimental part. So far in an attempt to do this i have tried changing a single parameter in the equation i used to generate the theoretical curve, so that the sum of the differences between each observed and theoretical value is minimized.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

as an example - my calculations are as follows:

(O1-T1)^2 = x

(O2-T2)^2 = y

where O and T stand for observed and theoretical. I then have summed x & y and then in excel change my parameter in the equation until x+y is minimized.

the results i get are shown in the picture.

I'm just wondering if there is a better method at getting the upper part of my curve to match as closely as possible.

Also keep in mind I'm allowed to change any of the parameters in the equation i have used.

any advice would be greatly appreciated thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Curve fitting

Loading...

Similar Threads - Curve fitting | Date |
---|---|

A Weighting data points with fitted curve in Matlab | Aug 1, 2017 |

Calculating log liklihood: Zero value of likelihood function | Apr 6, 2015 |

Fitting distribution to histogram with low number of counts | Feb 24, 2015 |

Fitting experimental data with exponential curve | Jul 31, 2014 |

Fitting a curve to data with error bars on curve parameters | Apr 7, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**