- #1
arithmuggle
- 3
- 0
1. The problem statement
Given an n-dimensional CW complex on a space X, show that each n-cell is open in X.
Definition of CW Complex
1. The cells form a disjoint union of X
2. For each k-cell e, there is a relative homeomorphism :
[tex]\phi: (D^k, S^{k-1}) \rightarrow (e \cup X^{k-1}, X^{k-1})[/tex]
3. For each k-cell e, [tex] \phi(S^{k-1}) \subset \bigcup\limits_{i=1}^n e_i[/tex] where each e_i has dimension less than k.
4. A subset [tex]A \subset X [/tex] is closed if and only if [tex]A \cap \overline{e} [/tex] is closed in [tex] \overline{e}[/tex] for every e.
Solution work
I feel that I can show that the n-1 skeleton is closed and so showing that the n-cells are components would give it.
Otherwise I was just trying to play with the weak topology condition to see if I can show it directly.
Either way I'm having trouble.
Given an n-dimensional CW complex on a space X, show that each n-cell is open in X.
Definition of CW Complex
1. The cells form a disjoint union of X
2. For each k-cell e, there is a relative homeomorphism :
[tex]\phi: (D^k, S^{k-1}) \rightarrow (e \cup X^{k-1}, X^{k-1})[/tex]
3. For each k-cell e, [tex] \phi(S^{k-1}) \subset \bigcup\limits_{i=1}^n e_i[/tex] where each e_i has dimension less than k.
4. A subset [tex]A \subset X [/tex] is closed if and only if [tex]A \cap \overline{e} [/tex] is closed in [tex] \overline{e}[/tex] for every e.
Solution work
I feel that I can show that the n-1 skeleton is closed and so showing that the n-cells are components would give it.
Otherwise I was just trying to play with the weak topology condition to see if I can show it directly.
Either way I'm having trouble.