Hi everyone.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So it's apparent that G/N cyclic --> G cyclic. But the converse does not seem to hold; in fact, from what I can discern, given N cyclic, all we need for G/N cyclic is that G is finitely generated. That is, if G=<g1,...,gn>, we can construct:

G/N=<(g1 * ... *gn)*k>

Where k is the generator of N and * the group operation. To create each coset g1N... gnN, we simply take gi for i=0,1,...n and then set all other (n-1) elements to the identity under the group operation, {e}. Thus we have n generators for g, but only one generator for G/N. Is this reasoning sound?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Cyclic quotient group?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Cyclic quotient group | Date |
---|---|

I Quotient Rings ... Remarks by Adkins and Weintraub ... | Saturday at 7:36 PM |

I Proving a lemma on decomposition of V to T-cyclic subspace | Mar 16, 2017 |

I Nature of cyclic groups | Feb 21, 2017 |

Determine if a group is cyclic | Sep 17, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**