Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm reading Becker2Schwarz, chapter 5.1, about D0 branes in the GS formalism. They introduce kappa-symmetry, and end the section with "without this symmetry there would be the wrong number of propagating degrees of freedom".

I'm trying to understand that. The fermions [tex]\Theta^a[/tex] have, for D=10, [tex]2^5=32[/tex] complex components. But they are Majorana-Weyl, so this brings this number back to [tex]\frac{32}{4}=8[/tex] complex components. Kappa-symmetry implies that half of these fermions are gauge degrees of freedom, giving us 8 real components.

However, for the D0-brane, which is a particle, we start with 10 real components [tex]X^{\mu}[/tex]. Choosing e.g. the static gauge brings this back to 9 components. Obviously, to have as many bosonic degrees of freedom as fermionic (8 real), I need to get rid of another bosonic degree of freedom. How do I do that?

Perhaps I'm also confused by worldsheet SUSY versus target space SUSY; to realize target space SUSY on [tex]\{\Theta^a,X^{\mu}\}[/tex] one doesn't need this kappa symmetry, right?

Any help is appreciated :)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# D0-branes and counting

Loading...

Similar Threads for branes counting |
---|

I How does gravitation fit into this picture of branes? |

B Branes, gluons, time reversal, and string theory. |

Insights Super p-Brane Theory Emerging from Super Homotopy Theory - Comments |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**