Damping Term of a Photon

  • Thread starter Watts
  • Start date
38
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Typically photon attenuation is determined by the equation [itex]I = I_0 \cdot e^{ - (\mu \cdot z)}[/itex]. The variable mu is the linear attenuation coefficient and z is the distance traveled through the substance of transport. Is it safe to say that [itex]I_0 \cdot e^{ - (\mu \cdot z)}[/itex] is the damping term of the electromagnetic wave for the photon? My question is can I write [itex]I(z,t) = I_0 \cdot e^{ - (\mu \cdot z)} \cdot e^{i \cdot (k \cdot z - \omega \cdot t)}[/itex].
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

9
0
Yes. Carry on.
 
38
0
Photon

I can’t carry on any further my question is stated. Am I being unclear?
 
ehild
Homework Helper
15,361
1,778
Watts said:
Typically photon attenuation is determined by the equation [itex]I = I_0 \cdot e^{ - (\mu \cdot z)}[/itex]. The variable mu is the linear attenuation coefficient and z is the distance traveled through the substance of transport. Is it safe to say that [itex]I_0 \cdot e^{ - (\mu \cdot z)}[/itex] is the damping term of the electromagnetic wave for the photon? My question is can I write [itex]I(z,t) = I_0 \cdot e^{ - (\mu \cdot z)} \cdot e^{i \cdot (k \cdot z - \omega \cdot t)}[/itex].

What do you mean on I? If it is electric or magnetic field intensity, your formula is right if that wave travels in direction z, in a homogeneous isotropic medium. If I is the intensity your formula is wrong. Moreover, the wave is damped, not the photon. Damping means that the number of photons decreases with the distance travelled in an absorbing medium.

ehild
 
38
0
Intensity

I is the intensity.
 
ehild
Homework Helper
15,361
1,778
Watts said:
I is the intensity.
The intensity changes as

[tex]I=I_0 e^{-\mu z}[/tex]

ehild
 

Related Threads for: Damping Term of a Photon

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
556
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
798
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Top