Dang Van multiaxial fatigue criterion

  • #1
1
0
Hello everyone,

I am trying to find a difference between two versions of the Dang Van criterion on multiaxial fatigue.
Let's say that Dang Van 1 is the one that uses a critical plane and Dang Van 2 the one that uses the Tresca criterion (which means no critical plane)

I assume that the only difference lies in the fact that Dang Van 2 is way faster when computed since it does not require the search of a specific plane

But is there any way those 2 criterion can give different results for a same fatigue cycle?

I wrote a programm in which both criterion are computed and I have not been able to find a case where different results can be obtained, even with non proportionnal stress

Does anyone has any clue?

Thank you for answering :)

Oznerol
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
18,354
8,145
Thanks for the post! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 

Related Threads on Dang Van multiaxial fatigue criterion

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
705
Replies
3
Views
23K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
247
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
661
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
52K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
5K
Top