I have a problem that ask for the minimum energy of a wave that we will use to see a particle of size .1 nm. I understand that I can not see a .1 nm particle with any wave length larger than .1 nm. I thought this would be easy and I would use De Broglis relation of electron waves. (f=E/h) or E=fh=hc/λ. Using this I get 12400eV..... this is the wrong answer.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

What the book says to do is use an eqn. "wavelength associated with a particle of mass M.

it is: λ=hc/sqrt(2mc^2K) OR for my specific case: λ=1.226/sqrt(K) nm

This second equation , if im correct, is getting the kinetic energy of the wavelength, not the total energy.

I do not understand what I should be looking for in problems asking for energy of wavelengths to distinguish the use of the first eqn I presented Vs the second one. Any enlightenment on this area would be appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# De Broglie Relation for Freq of Electron wave VS wavelength associa with part of mass

Loading...

Similar Threads for Broglie Relation Freq | Date |
---|---|

I What specific momentum should be used in the matter wave? | Apr 11, 2016 |

I The Debroglie Relation and SR? | Apr 6, 2016 |

Doubt regarding derivation of De Broglie relation | Dec 14, 2015 |

De Broglie theory and relativity | Jun 12, 2014 |

De broglie wavelength derived from relativity but used in non relativity? | Feb 2, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**