De Broglie wavelength of particle in potential V

In summary: This is because the particle's total energy (kinetic + potential) must be conserved. In summary, the de Broglie wavelength of a particle in a potential V is given by ##\lambda_{new}=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2m(E-V)}}##, and for ##V\gt{E}##, the particle cannot be found in regions where the potential is greater than the initial kinetic energy.
  • #1
yxgao
123
0
The initial kinetic energy of a free particle is E and has wavelength [tex]\lambda[/tex]. What is the de Broglie wavelength of a particle in a potential V?

This is what I have so far:

Since [tex]k=\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}[/tex],
the original de Broglie wavelength of the a free particle is:
[tex]\lambda = \frac{h}{p} = \frac{h}{\hbar k} = \frac{h}{\hbar} \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2mE}}=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2mE}}[/tex]

When the particle enters the region of potential V,
we solve Schrodinger's equation to get
[tex]
\lambda_{new}=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2m(E-V)}}
[/tex]

So that the new wavelength is:
[tex]
\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{1-\frac{V}{E}}}
[/tex]


This kind of confusing because it means that the potential energy can only be as large as the kinetic energy to give real values of the new wavelength - why is this? Or should the wavelength be:
[tex]
\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{\frac{V}{E}-1}}
[/tex]


Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The first expression, ##(1-V/E)^{-1/2}## is correct; you can get that result from the de Broglie wavelength formula if you take the kinetic energy to be ##E-V##, consistent with the kinetic energy being ##E## when there is no potential.

The result you get for ##V\gt{E}## is just telling you that the particle cannot be found in regions where the potential is greater than the initial kinetic energy.
 

1. What is the De Broglie wavelength of a particle in a potential V?

The De Broglie wavelength of a particle in a potential V is a physical quantity that describes the wave-like behavior of a particle as it travels through a potential energy field. It is given by the equation λ = h/p, where λ is the De Broglie wavelength, h is Planck's constant, and p is the momentum of the particle.

2. How is the De Broglie wavelength related to the potential energy of a particle?

The De Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to the square root of the potential energy of a particle. This means that as the potential energy increases, the De Broglie wavelength decreases. This relationship is known as the de Broglie relation and is an important concept in quantum mechanics.

3. What is the significance of the De Broglie wavelength in quantum mechanics?

The De Broglie wavelength is significant in quantum mechanics because it helps to explain the wave-particle duality of matter. This concept states that particles, such as electrons, can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior, and the De Broglie wavelength is a measure of this wave-like behavior.

4. Can the De Broglie wavelength be measured experimentally?

Yes, the De Broglie wavelength can be measured experimentally using diffraction or interference experiments. These experiments involve passing a beam of particles through a diffraction grating or a double-slit, and measuring the resulting diffraction or interference pattern. The distance between the peaks in the pattern is related to the De Broglie wavelength of the particles.

5. How does the potential energy affect the De Broglie wavelength of a particle?

The potential energy of a particle affects its De Broglie wavelength by changing the momentum of the particle. As the potential energy increases, the momentum of the particle decreases, leading to a shorter De Broglie wavelength. Conversely, a decrease in potential energy results in an increase in momentum and a longer De Broglie wavelength.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
847
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
973
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
944
Back
Top