Debunking "c-decay": History & Facts

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Phobos
  • Start date Start date
Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,958
Reaction score
7
from chroot in this topic...
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6799

All such attempts to show the supposed 'c-decay' have involved the researcher cherry-picking observations in support of his hypothesis. In at least one case I've seen, the researcher committed deep intellectual dishonesty and actually reported an erroneous datum specifically to make it agree with his hypothesis.

Modern physics does not support c-decay, nor any mechanism that might support it. There is no experimental evidence that shows it happens, and a great deal of theoretical work that shows it cannot.

What's the history of this research?
Can anyone provide some good links/cites debunking the idea of c-decay?
 
on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K