Debunking String Theory. Why not starting to debunking the String dream? String theory is the result of the failure the Standard Theory gave. The concept of atoms, electrons and other elementary particle being little balls of spheres failed. There was a need to change the approach. Almost everyone knew that vibrations (and i.e. resonance) was essential. That approach was already used in the 1800's by people in (religious) Theosophy. Theosophists based there ideas on ancient Indian books. So the idea of vibration was nothing original at all, it was just old wine in new sack. And - myself - agree on that. But String Theory pretends to be an "accident" ... and the real theory will only appear in 2050!!!. Now that's great. What a statement! Already today the Guru's know that the are right ... but they have not concept. It's like building a house without a architectural plan. And we see also that a number of these Guru's (sorry Lubos my friend) refer to God. Is string theory a scientific religion? Another remarkable thing is that String Theory mixes an number of things. Can you imagine that gravitation is due to open strings ... which hang somewhere in the blue! Now if something should be (inter)connected that must be strings related to gravity. So in String Theory there is a lot of hokus-pokus. What's your idea?