Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Physics
Classical Physics
Electromagnetism
Decompose the E field into conservative and non-conservative parts
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="hutchphd, post: 6827610, member: 635497"] If all you have in your toolbox is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail. One can likely contrive situations where this approach has hueristic appeal. In general, for reasons well stated, it is a "solution" in search of a problem. For your symmetry argument to hold, the entire magnetic universe would need to be cylindrically symmetric. Might be tough. Stokes theorem deals with closed curves for a reason [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Physics
Classical Physics
Electromagnetism
Decompose the E field into conservative and non-conservative parts
Back
Top