Hi all. I'm studying deep inelastic cross section in parton model. In particular I'm referring to Halzen-Martin's "Quarks and leptons" section 8.5, but I think this is a quite generale procedure.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In studying the deep inelastic scattering by e- on proton it cuts off the electron part and work only on the virtual photon-proton part.

In doing so it's found out that the flux term is dependent on the photon virtuality by the relation:

$$4\sqrt{{(p_ap_b)}^2-m_a^2m_b^2}=4M\sqrt{K^2-q^2}$$

where K is the photon flux (unknow because of the virtuality), q is the photon quadri-momentum and M is the proton mass.

Now, it chooses the flux factor to satisfy theHand convention:

$$K=\nu + \frac{q^2}{2M}$$

This choise is made in order to threat the photon as in the real case. But why we have such a freedom in defining the flux factor??

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Deep inelastic scattering: quention on the Hand convention for the flux.

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Deep inelastic scattering | Date |
---|---|

I Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment proton decay | Jul 22, 2017 |

B Deep inelastic scattering | Feb 10, 2017 |

I Deep inelastic scattering and the Q^2 large limit | Oct 24, 2016 |

I Meaning of inelastic scattering length | Jul 12, 2016 |

Deep inelastic scattering | May 4, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**